Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: validation of World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 918-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Dagher ◽  
Brett Delahunt ◽  
Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Lars Egevad ◽  
John R Srigley ◽  
...  
Uro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-13
Author(s):  
Maj Rabjerg ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Birte Engvad ◽  
Niels Marcussen

This study was undertaken to compare Fuhrman grading with World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grading and stereologically measured nuclear area in patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) or Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (PRCC) and to evaluate the independent predictive value of Fuhrman, WHO/ISUP and stereologically measured nuclear area combined with necrosis in a series of patients with ccRCC in relation to cancer-specific survival. In all, 124 cases of ccRCC and PRCC were included. All slides were blindly scored by two trained pathologists according to the Fuhrman and WHO/ISUP grading systems. Nuclear measurements were performed on digitally scanned slides in Visiopharm® and correlated to survival. Analysis of ccRCC and PRCC cases showed that application of WHO/ISUP grading resulted in a significant downgrading of cases from G2 to G1, when comparing with Fuhrman grading. Neither of these patients experienced progression. Cancer specific survival estimates in 101 ccRCC patients showed that WHO/ISUP grading was slightly superior in predicting cancer-specific survival. Novel models included WHO/ISUP grading and mean nuclear area (MNA) each of which combined with necrosis. Both demonstrated an increased ability to predict cancer-specific survival. The study demonstrates that WHO/ISUP grading provides superior prognostic information compared to Fuhrman grading and stereologically measured nuclear area. Necrosis in combination with either WHO/ISUP grading or MNA adds additional prognostic information.


2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 1026-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Udager ◽  
Rohit Mehra

Molecular and morphologic interrogation has driven a much-needed reexamination of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Indeed, the recently released 2016 World Health Organization classification now recognizes 12 distinct RCC subtypes, as well as several other emerging/provisional RCC entities. From a clinical perspective, accurate RCC classification may have important implications for patients and their families, including prognostic risk stratification, targeted therapeutics selection, and identification for genetic testing. In this review, we provide a conceptual framework for approaching RCC diagnosis and classification by categorizing RCCs as tumors with clear cytoplasm, papillary architecture, and eosinophilic (oncocytic) cytoplasm. The currently recognized 2016 World Health Organization classification for RCC subtypes is briefly discussed, including new diagnostic entities (clear cell papillary RCC, hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC-associated RCC, succinate dehydrogenase–deficient RCC, tubulocystic RCC, and acquired cystic disease–associated RCC) and areas of evolving RCC classification, such as transcription elongation factor B subunit 1 (TCEB1)–mutated RCC/RCC with angioleiomyoma-like stroma/RCC with leiomyomatous stroma, RCC associated with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and RCC in neuroblastoma survivors. For each RCC subtype, relevant clinical, molecular, gross, and microscopic findings are reviewed, and ancillary studies helpful for its differential diagnosis are presented, providing a practical approach to modern RCC classification.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 050-052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailja Puri Wahal ◽  
Kavita Mardi

ABSTRACTMultilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (MCRCC) represents a rare variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MCRCC has been recognized as a separate subtype of RCC in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of adult renal tumors. MCRCC is diagnosed on the basis of strict histological criteria according to 2004 WHO classification. The chief differentials diagnosis to be considered include cystic nephroma, cystic clear cell carcinoma, clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and tubulocystic carcinoma. Only few cases of MCRCC are reported in literature. This case is being highlighted for its rarity and so as to avoid a misdiagnosis as conventional RCC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Browning ◽  
Richard Colling ◽  
Clare Verrill

Abstract Background There are recognised potential pitfalls in digital diagnosis in urological pathology, including the grading of dysplasia. The World Health Organisation/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is prognostically important in clear cell RCC (CCRCC) and papillary RCC (PRCC), and is included in risk stratification scores for CCRCC, thus impacting on patient management. To date there are no systematic studies examining the concordance of WHO/ISUP grading between digital pathology (DP) and glass slide (GS) images. We present a validation study examining intraobserver agreement in WHO/ISUP grade of CCRCC and PRCC. Methods Fifty CCRCCs and 10 PRCCs were graded (WHO/ISUP system) by three specialist uropathologists on three separate occasions (DP once then two GS assessments; GS1 and GS2) separated by wash-out periods of at least two-weeks. The grade was recorded for each assessment, and compared using Cohen’s and Fleiss’s kappa. Results There was 65 to 78% concordance of WHO/ISUP grading on DP and GS1. Furthermore, for the individual pathologists, the comparative kappa scores for DP versus GS1, and GS1 versus GS2, were 0.70 and 0.70, 0.57 and 0.73, and 0.71 and 0.74, and with no apparent tendency to upgrade or downgrade on DP versus GS. The interobserver kappa agreement was less, at 0.58 on DP and 0.45 on GS. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the assessment of WHO/ISUP grade on DP is noninferior to that on GS. There is an apparent slight improvement in agreement between pathologists on RCC grade when assessed on DP, which may warrant further study.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 214-214
Author(s):  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Byung Kyu Han ◽  
In Ho Chang ◽  
June Hyun Han ◽  
Ji Hyung Yu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document