2D and 3D radiographic outcome assessment of the effect of guided tissue regeneration using resorbable collagen membrane in the healing of through‐and‐through periapical lesions – a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 935-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Parmar ◽  
R. Dhamija ◽  
S. Tewari ◽  
P. Sangwan ◽  
A. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Radiographic Outcome ◽  
Periapical Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
2D And 3D

Outcome Assessment and Clinical Improvement in Panic Disorder: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluoxetine and Placebo

1998 ◽  
Vol 155 (11) ◽  
pp. 1570-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Michelson ◽  
R. Bruce Lydiard ◽  
Mark H. Pollack ◽  
Roy N. Tamura ◽  
Sharon L. Hoog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals A two-year report of a comparative randomized controlled trial on the treatment of upper central incisors with periapical lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Daniele Angerame ◽  
Matteo De Biasi ◽  
Vittorio Franco ◽  
Lorenzo Bevilacqua ◽  
Attilio Castaldo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Periapical Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Upper central incisors with periapical lesions treated with two integrated endodontic systems: a six-month randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Angerame ◽  
Matteo De Biasi ◽  
Vittorio Franco ◽  
Lorenzo Bevilacqua ◽  
Attilio Castaldo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Periapical Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 9339
Author(s):  
Jonas Czwikla ◽  
Alexandra Herzberg ◽  
Sonja Kapp ◽  
Stephan Kloep ◽  
Heinz Rothgang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Care Recipients

We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t0, the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t1, blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document