Micro-CT evaluation of sonically and ultrasonically activated irrigation on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1173-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Rödig ◽  
C. Koberg ◽  
S. Baxter ◽  
F. Konietschke ◽  
A. Wiegand ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Versiani ◽  
F. R. F. Alves ◽  
C. V. Andrade-Junior ◽  
M. F. Marceliano-Alves ◽  
J. C. Provenzano ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 681-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva ◽  
Carla Rodrigues Carvalho ◽  
Felipe Gonçalves Belladonna ◽  
Marina Carvalho Prado ◽  
Ricardo Tadeu Lopes ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo De-Deus ◽  
Felipe Gonçalves Belladonna ◽  
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva ◽  
Juliana Roter Marins ◽  
Erick Miranda Souza ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare the percentage of non-instrumented area of root canals prepared with different enlargements using single-file reciprocating systems (Reciproc and WaveOne) and a conventional multi-file rotary (BioRaCe) system by micro-computed tomographic analysis. Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars with moderate curvature (10° to 20°) presenting a type II Vertucci canal configuration and similar internal volume were chosen and scanned at an isotropic resolution of 14.16 µm. The sample was assigned to 3 groups (n=10) according to the system used for root canal preparation: Reciproc, WaveOne, and BioRaCe groups. Second and third scans were taken after the canals were prepared with instruments sizes 25 and 40, respectively. The recorded images of the surface area voxels of the canals, before and after preparation were examined from the furcation level to the apex to quantify the non-instrumented surface. Statistical data were compared using GLM for repeated-measures with a significance level set at 5%. Instrumentation systems did not influence the percentage of untouched root canal surfaces (p=0.690) whilst a significant reduction in the percentage of static voxels was observed after the enlargement of the root canal (p=0.010) in all groups (p=0.507). None of the systems was able to prepare the entire surface area of the mesial root canal of mandibular molars. The increased final apical size resulted in a significant positive effect on the shaping ability of the tested systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
Manuela Favarin Santini ◽  
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago ◽  
Jefferson Ricardo Pereira ◽  
Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to quantify the residual filling material after filling removal, re-preparation with rotary or reciprocating files and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Twenty maxillary molars were prepared using ProTaper instruments up to F1. The teeth were filled with AH Plus and ProTaper gutta-percha points using the single-cone technique. Thereafter, the specimens were scanned using a micro-computed tomography system (Micro-CT #1). Then, the root canal filling was removed using ProTaper Retreatment files, and a new scan was performed (Micro-CT #2). The specimens were divided into two groups according to the instrument used for re-preparation: ProTaper rotary or WaveOne reciprocating files (Micro-CT #3). Finally, PUI was performed, and a new micro-CT scan was performed (Micro-CT #4). Intragroup and intergroup analyses were performed using Friedman and Dunn's post hoc test and the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, respectively. Palatal canal presented the highest volume of residual filling material in all stages of endodontic retreatment (p<0.05). The main reduction of filling volume was achieved after using ProTaper Retreament (p<0.05). The amount of remaining filling material after using ProTaper Retreatment was similar to that achieved with rotary and reciprocating files and after PUI (p>0.05). Rotary and reciprocating files achieved similar removal of the root canal filling (p>0.05). The greatest reduction in filling material was achieved after using ProTaper Retreatment files. Rotary and reciprocating instruments and PUI did not improve the removal of root canal filling materials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Nigri Roizenblit ◽  
Fabiola Ormiga Soares ◽  
Ricardo Tadeu Lopes ◽  
Bernardo Camargo Santos ◽  
Heloisa Gusman

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Neelakantan ◽  
Khadija Khan ◽  
Geoffrey Pak Hei Ng ◽  
Chui Ying Yip ◽  
ChengFei Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document