The underreporting of medication errors: A retrospective and comparative root cause analysis in an acute mental health unit over a 3-year period

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1719-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve Morrison ◽  
Vicki Cope ◽  
Melanie Murray
2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Neal ◽  
D. Watson ◽  
T. Hicks ◽  
M. Porter ◽  
D. Hill

The Department of Health publication Building a Safer NHS for Patients sets out the Government's plans for promoting patient safety (Department of Health, 2001). This follows growing international recognition that health services around the world have underestimated the scale of unintended harm or injury experienced by patients as a result of medical error and adverse events occurring in health care settings. These plans include a commitment to replace the procedures set out in the Department of Health circular HSG(94)27. This guidance details the methods for investigating every homicide (and some suicides) by patients in current or recent contact with specialist mental health services. Part of the process to modernise HSG(94)27 includes a plan to build expertise within the National Health Service (NHS) in the technique of root cause analysis. This investigative process was developed in industry to identify causal or systems factors in serious adverse events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-134
Author(s):  
Julia Gilbert ◽  
Jeong-ah Kim

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore an identified medication error using a root cause analysis and a clinical case study. Design/methodology/approach In this paper the authors explore a medication error through the completion of a root cause analysis and case study in an aged care facility. Findings Research indicates that medication errors are highly prevalent in aged care and 40 per cent of nursing home patients are regularly receiving at least one potentially inappropriate medicine (Hamilton, 2009; Raban et al., 2014; Shehab et al., 2016). Insufficient patient information, delays in continuing medications, poor communication, the absence of an up-to-date medication chart and missed or significantly delayed doses are all linked to medication errors (Dwyer et al., 2014). Strategies to improve medication management across hospitalisation to medication administration include utilisation of a computerised medication prescription and management system, pharmacist review, direct communication of discharge medication documentation to community pharmacists and staff education and support (Dolanski et al., 2013). Originality/value Discussion of the factors impacting on medication errors within aged care facilities may explain why they are prevalent and serve as a basis for strategies to improve medication management and facilitate further research on this topic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-43
Author(s):  
Ghada Hussain Al Mardawi ◽  
Rajkumar Rajendram ◽  
Souzan Mohammed Alowesie ◽  
Mufareh Alkatheri

ABSTRACT Introduction A full root cause analysis (RCA) such as that required following a sentinel event is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. This quality improvement project used a similar but abbreviated process (mini-RCA and action; mini-RCA2) in response to medication errors that caused less serious harm. Methods In 2018, all medication errors that caused harm due to system failures but were not sentinel events were investigated by mini-RCA2. The incidence of similar medication errors reported in the year before and in the year after the introduction of mini-RCA2 was compared to determine the impact of this intervention. Similar events were identified by searching the safety reporting system database for reported medication errors by drug name (e.g., Humate® P) and/or event type (e.g., prescribing error—omission of a patient's home medications on admission to hospital). The time and labor costs of this intervention were estimated. Results Seven medication errors were investigated by mini-RCA2. More than 48 members of staff from 11 clinical and nonclinical departments contributed to the identification of 39 system failures and made 42 recommendations, of which 22 (52%) were implemented. This reduced the recurrence of reports of similar events from 35 (0.57%) to 21 (0.36%). Although this 0.21% absolute decrease did not achieve statistical significance, recurrence of similar harm events was reduced from 7 (0.11%) to 0 (p = 0.016). Benefits were greatest when the mini-RCA2 recommendations were fully implemented. This reduced the recurrence of similar events from 9 (0.21%) to 0 (p = 0.007). A total of 251 hours (mean ± SD, 35.9 ± 16.6 hours) were required for this intervention. The associated labor cost was Saudi Arabia Riyal (SAR) 34,181 (US $8256; mean SAR ± SD, 4883 ± 1302 [mean US $ ± SD, $2102 ± $561]). Conclusion The use of mini-RCA2 to review medication errors provided a structured process to manage reported events, monitor the implementation of recommendations, and assess the effectiveness of implemented actions. The use of this rapid process to investigate errors that cause harm but are not sentinel events reduced recurrence of similar medication errors. Although the time and cost required for this intervention is not insignificant, the cumulative benefit to patients, healthcare professionals, and the organization are greater.


Author(s):  
Mary Burkhardt ◽  
Caryl Lee ◽  
Lesley Taylor ◽  
Rodney Williams ◽  
James Bagian

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Knudsen ◽  
H Herborg ◽  
A R Mortensen ◽  
M Knudsen ◽  
A Hellebek

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-277
Author(s):  
Souad FILALI EL GHORFI ◽  

Medication error (ME) is a serious problem of public health. Difficulties related to the management of this error are numerous. Each stage of this process suffers from several flaws: identification, root causes analysis and improvement. This paper focuses on root cause analysis of medication error. We developed an original semi-quantitative method named “MAC-F (Méthode d’Analyse des Causes basée sur la Fiabilité globale, in French). It’s specific to the hospital context and constitutes a decision-making tool for professional of care. It based on a rigorous theoretical and conceptual framework (human reliability theory and high reliability organization theory). We used our method MAC F to analyze serious proven medication errors. They have been collected over the past six months (from January to June 2020) in Moroccan hospital. The reliability matrix shows that the overall reliability index is very low (Ω= 0,07). Moroccan hospital is therefore unreliable. The failure of the organizational system (Ω CF= 0,03) and the absence of preventive strategies (ΩIF= 0) don’t help practitioners to recover the medication errors (ΩSF= 0,23). Root cause analysis is the most critical step in managing medication errors. Our aim is to provide healthcare professionals with a decision support tool “MAC-F” that we believe will help them to prevent Medication Errors and to achieve overall reliability (reliable organization and practitioner). Our method was tested in a Belgian hospital before and Moroccan hospital recently.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Dolansky ◽  
Kalina Druschel ◽  
Maura Helba ◽  
Kathleen Courtney

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzette Woodward ◽  
Mike Rejman ◽  
Kathryn Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document