An Unusual Case of Quinidine-induced Systemic Disease as an Exercise in Clinical Decision-making

2009 ◽  
Vol 201 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Biörck ◽  
Kaj Lindvall ◽  
Inger Wahlberg
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Chun Huang ◽  
Ching Hsueh ◽  
Shang-Yun Ho ◽  
Chiung-Ying Liao

We described a case of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) of the lung of a 65-year-old man with initial symptoms of intermittent chest pain and mild shortness of breath for 2 weeks. A right-lung mass was noted on chest computed tomography (CT) scan and was proved histopathologically as LELC of lung after video-assisted thorascopic lobectomy. He was successfully treated with lobectomy with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and is alive without signs of recurrence for 36 months after the diagnosis. It is important for clinicians, pathologists, and radiologists to understand the clinical, pathological, and radiological presentations of this neoplasm to avoid improper clinical decision making and misdiagnosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 377-377
Author(s):  
Janice Ser Huey Tan ◽  
Charles Xian-Yang Goh ◽  
Youquan Li ◽  
Jeffrey Tuan ◽  
Eu Tiong Chua ◽  
...  

377 Background: In patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RadP), risk stratification by clinical indices alone is suboptimal for identifying subgroups likely to benefit from salvage radiotherapy (RT). It is also recommended that combination hormonal therapy (HT)-RT improves rates of salvage and survival, hence the need for a clinical tool to better stratify patients for RT and HT-RT; the latter approach for patients at risk of occult metastases. Herein, we investigated the role of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-PET in the detection of regional and distal recurrences, and for clinical decision making in a prospective cohort of patients with BCR post-RadP. Methods: 68Ga-PSMA-PET and CT were performed in a cohort of 50 RadP patients with BCR. Radiological interpretation was independently performed by two assessors, who were blinded to the patient identifiers. PSMA+ lesions were considered as true positives; negative-PSMA in the presence of continued PSA rise defined false negative. Impact on clinical decision making was reviewed by comparison of PSMA-PET and CT findings in the post-RadP PSA 0.5-2.0 ng/ml subgroup. Results: Overall detection rate for 68Ga-PSMA/PET was 74% (37 of 50) in our cohort with a median post-RadP PSA level of 2.19 (IQR = 0.45-4.26). Detection rates were significantly increased at a PSA cut-off > 1.0; 96% (25 of 26) at > 2.0 and 100% (5 of 5) at 1.0-2.0 compared to 67% (4 of 6) at 0.5-1.0, and 23% (3 of 13) at < 0.5 (P < 0.001). In 0.5-2.0 PSA subgroup, 3 regional nodes and 11 distal (6 nodes, 4 bones, 1 lung) lesions were detected. This altered treatment in 5 of the 11 (46%) cases; 3 N+ cases would have been recommended for HT-RT and pelvic nodal RT, while RT would be omitted in 2 patients due to low volume systemic disease. Conclusions: Our findings support the existing data for PSMA-PET as a sensitive diagnostic tool for clinical recurrences post-RadP. Additionally, the detection of small volume nodal and distal lesions at post-RadP PSA levels of < 2.0 ng/ml highlights the potential utility of PSMA-PET for selecting patients to treatment intensification with HT-RT or omission of RT in cases of distal relapse.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document