A quantitative study of flow in prey capture by Rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri with general consideration of the actinopterygian feeding mechanism

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan L. Van Leeuwen
1981 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1228-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils-Arvid Nilsson ◽  
Thomas G. Northcote

Food, size, and growth of 17 allopatric and 10 sympatric lake populations of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and cutthroat trout (S. clarki) were compared as well as their aggressive behavior during feeding in experimental tanks. In allopatry, rainbow trout fed extensively on benthic, midwater, and surface prey. Allopatric cutthroat utilized mostly midwater prey but in contrast with rainbow trout also fish (Cottus, Gasterosteus) when available. In sympatry, rainbow trout exploited mainly limnetic surface and midwater prey whereas cutthroat trout utilized more littoral prey and were much more piscivorous in feeding. Allopatric rainbow attained a greater average and maximum size (length, weight) than allopatric cutthroat whereas in sympatric populations cutthroat were clearly larger than rainbow. Growth (size at specific ages) usually was higher for rainbow compared with cutthroat trout in allopatric populations but just the reverse in sympatric populations. When held as matched pairs in aquaria, rainbow consistently were more aggressive than cutthroat trout and displayed different patterns of threat as well as means of prey capture. Differences in feeding and growth in sympatry may result from interactive segregation, the more pronounced aggressiveness of rainbow promoting higher growth in cutthroat trout.Key words: rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, feeding, growth, habitat, aggressive behavior, feeding behavior, interactive segregation


1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1801-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. McCauley ◽  
W. L. Pond

Preferred temperatures of underyearling rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) were determined in both vertical and horizontal temperature gradients. No statistically significant difference was found between the preferred temperatures by the two different methods. This suggests that the nature of the gradient plays a lesser role than generally believed in laboratory investigations of temperature preference.


1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torill Bergsjø ◽  
Inger Nafstad ◽  
Kristian Ingebrigtsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document