scholarly journals A preliminary secular variation reference curve for archaeomagnetic dating in Austria

2006 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Schnepp ◽  
Philippe Lanos
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Edwin Evans ◽  
Antonio Correia

We report archaeomagnetic results from four pottery kilns in Portugal which are thought to belong to the period of Roman rule (3rd Century BCE-4th Century CE). Very few details have been published to date, so this broad assignment is based on the general archaeological context at each site. Our motivation was to see if a more precise chronology could be established by means of archaeomagnetic dating. Concomitant goals were to compare these results from Portugal to their counterparts in Spain and to expand geographic coverage of the regional geomagnetic secular variation reference curve. Experimentally, all the samples behaved in a very coherent manner during progressive alternating-field demagnetization and yielded high-precision mean archaeomagnetic directions (a95<3°) for each site. The results suggest that two of the kilns, Castelo de Vide and Peniche, were most likely in use during the late 1st/early 2nd centuries CE, whereas the two kilns at Seixal are somewhat younger, dating to the late 2nd to early 4th centuries CE.


2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhui Cai ◽  
Guiyun Jin ◽  
Lisa Tauxe ◽  
Chenglong Deng ◽  
Huafeng Qin ◽  
...  

Variations of the Earth’s geomagnetic field during the Holocene are important for understanding centennial to millennial-scale processes of the Earth’s deep interior and have enormous potential implications for chronological correlations (e.g., comparisons between different sedimentary recording sequences, archaeomagnetic dating). Here, we present 21 robust archaeointensity data points from eastern China spanning the past ∼6 kyr. These results add significantly to the published data both regionally and globally. Taking together, we establish an archaeointensity reference curve for Eastern Asia, which can be used for archaeomagnetic dating in this region. Virtual axial dipole moments (VADMs) of the data range from a Holocene-wide low of ∼27 to “spike” values of ∼166 ZAm2(Z: 1021). The results, in conjunction with our recently published data, confirm the existence of a decrease in paleointensity (DIP) in China around ∼2200 BCE. These low intensities are the lowest ever found for the Holocene and have not been reported outside of China. We also report a spike intensity of 165.8 ± 6.0 ZAm2at ∼1300 BCE (±300 y), which is either a prelude to or the same event (within age uncertainties) as spikes first reported in the Levant.


Radiocarbon ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Catanzariti ◽  
G McIntosh ◽  
M L Osete ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
A Z Rakowski ◽  
...  

Reference archaeomagnetic secular variation (SV) curves recently have been proposed for the Iberian Peninsula and may now be used for archaeomagnetic dating. Archaeomagnetic dating is a relative dating technique that is strongly dependent on the age control of the data used to construct the reference curves. In order to test the method, an archaeological structure from central Spain has been studied. Samples have been taken for both archaeomagnetic and radiocarbon dating, and the results are compared. Close agreement is observed between both techniques, with the archaeomagnetic age of AD 603–999 overlapping the calibrated age of AD 770–890. These results demonstrate the reliability of the proposed reference curves as a dating tool within the Iberian Peninsula during this archaeological period.


2007 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Zananiri ◽  
C.M. Batt ◽  
Ph. Lanos ◽  
D.H. Tarling ◽  
P. Linford

1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Eighmy ◽  
Robert S. Sternberg ◽  
Robert F. Butler

Although archaeomagnetic dating seems straightforward in principle, there are practical limitations which are not generally understood. Unlike rate-dependent processes such as isotopic dating, archaeomagnetic dating requires the construction of a master record of geomagnetic secular variation. Error is inherent in such a master curve due to statistical uncertainties regarding both the magnetic directions and ages of the samples used to create the curve. The master curve itself is thus best represented as a ribbon rather than a line. Features being dated have their own error of measurement of magnetic direction, and deriving a date involves an interpretation based on the relation between the oval of confidence for the unknown and the ribbon representing the master curve. Thus a practical precision limit for archaeomagnetic dating is about ± 20 years under optimal circumstances, but the limit will generally be higher. Our pilot study revealed no major discrepancies between our work and the curves of DuBois (1975).


Antiquity ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (244) ◽  
pp. 567-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Dearden ◽  
Anthony Clark

Archaeomagnetic dating has recently come of age. The creation of the British reference curve in 1988 allows the authors plausibly to link a north French site with a well-known historical event


1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 297-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kluft ◽  
G Wijngaards ◽  
H van Voorthuizen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document