Implant treatment in periodontitis-susceptible patients: a systematic review

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (s1) ◽  
pp. 9-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. SCHOU
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Implant Treatment

scholarly journals Intrusion of upper molars with mini-implants for open bite correction is effective? A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 461
Author(s):  
Ana de Lourdes Sá De Lira ◽  
Gustavo Pinho Nascimento ◽  
Tennessee Felipe Costa Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Mini Implants ◽  
Molar Intrusion ◽  
Upper Molar ◽  
Implant Treatment

<pre><strong>Introduction:</strong> The open bite is a malocclusion defined by the absence of a positive vertical overlap of the upper incisors over the lower ones. It is believed that the correction of this malocclusion with mini-implants is as effective as another technique. <strong>Objective:</strong> To verify by scientific evidence the effectiveness of upper molar intrusion with mini-implants for correction of open bite. <strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.3) was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies. <strong>Results:</strong> During the selection and evaluation process, 795 of the 1297 papers were eligible for research in their titles and abstracts. Repeated articles were removed and as a result, 21 articles were retrieved and read completely. Those who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, resulting in only 6 articles that were included. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The intrusion of the upper molars with the use of mini-implants as a skeletal anchor is effective for open bite correction. When the technique of upper molar intrusion with mini-implants was compared with the technique of posterior high pull and incisor extrusion, the first one was more effective for the correction of open bite. The recurrence of molar intrusion does not invalidate mini-implant treatment for open bite correction because the benefits achieved outweigh the small dental relapse.</pre><pre><strong>Keywords</strong></pre><pre> Orthodontics, corrective; Tooth intrusion; Open bite.</pre>

scholarly journals Implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss: A systematic review

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frej Nørgaard Petersen ◽  
Simon Storgård Jensen ◽  
Morten Dahl
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Implant Treatment

Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dandan Song ◽  
Sohaib Shujaat ◽  
Politis Constantinus ◽  
Kaan Orhan ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Implant Treatment

Zygomatic Implants/Fixture: A Systematic Review

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashu Sharma ◽  
G. R. Rahul
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Zygomatic Implants ◽  
Le Fort I ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Zygomatic Implant ◽  
Anatomic Information

Patients with moderate to severe atrophy challenge the surgeon to discover alternative ways to use existing bone or resort to augmenting the patient with autogenous or alloplastic bone materials. Many procedures have been suggested for these atrophied maxillae before implant placement, which include Le Fort I maxillary downfracture, onlay bone grafts and maxillary sinus graft procedures. A zygomatic implant can be an effective device for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla. If zygomatic implants are used, onlay bone grafting or sinus augmentation would likely not be necessary. The purpose of this article is to review the developments that have taken place in zygomatic implant treatment over years, including anatomic information for installing the zygomatic implants, implant placement techniques, stabilization, and prosthodontic procedures.

scholarly journals Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henny J. A. Meijer ◽  
Carina Boven ◽  
Konstantina Delli ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Implant Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document