scholarly journals The Impact of Bisphosphonate Therapy upon Oral Implant Treatment; a Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikos M Kafantaris M
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e38-e46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
Fadi Ata-Ali ◽  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Pommer ◽  
Lavinia Bucur ◽  
Konstantin Zauza ◽  
Gabor Tepper ◽  
Markus Hof ◽  
...  

Dental implant fracture is a rare biomechanical complication, however, one of the most serious and frustating ones as it is generally associated with implant and prosthesis failure as well as the surgical hazards of explantation and reimplantation. To gain insights into implant fracture rates and the impact of patient-, surgery-, and prosthetic-related factors, systematic review and meta-analysis of the English literature were performed. Electronic and hand searches yielded 69 relevant publications reporting on 827 fractures out of 44521 implants investigated. The overall incidence of implant fractures was 1.6%. Mean patient age at the time of implant fracture was 54 ± 11 years, and 70% occurred in males. The vast majority (85%) occurred in posterior regions of the mouth (premolar or molar positions). No tendency of increased fracture rates could be noted for short implant lengths or narrow implant diameters. Implant fractures occurred after 4.1 ± 3.5 years of loading, on average, in most cases (88%) supporting fixed restorations; however, only 56% were preceded by screw loosening. Although further investigations are needed to fully explore the characteristics and causes of this rare complication, it can be concluded that no more than 2.8% of implants fracture is within a mean loading period of 8.3 years.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Van Rooyen ◽  
Ruth Stewart ◽  
Thea De Wet

Big international development donors such as the UK’s Department for International Development and USAID have recently started using systematic review as a methodology to assess the effectiveness of various development interventions to help them decide what is the ‘best’ intervention to spend money on. Such an approach to evidence-based decision-making has long been practiced in the health sector in the US, UK, and elsewhere but it is relatively new in the development field. In this article we use the case of a systematic review of the impact of microfinance on the poor in sub-Saharan African to indicate how systematic review as a methodology can be used to assess the impact of specific development interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document