Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: a systematic review

Author(s):  
Dandan Song ◽  
Sohaib Shujaat ◽  
Politis Constantinus ◽  
Kaan Orhan ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs
2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 523-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Peter Strietzel ◽  
Peter A. Reichart ◽  
Abhijit Kale ◽  
Milind Kulkarni ◽  
Brigitte Wegner ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Judd Sher ◽  
Kate Kirkham-Ali ◽  
Denny Luo ◽  
Catherine Miller ◽  
Dileep Sharma

The present systematic review evaluates the safety of placing dental implants in patients with a history of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drug therapy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases were used to search for clinical studies (English only) to July 16, 2019. Study quality was assessed regarding randomization, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case series. A broad search strategy resulted in the identification of 7542 studies. There were 28 studies reporting on bisphosphonates (5 cohort, 6 case control, and 17 case series) and one study reporting on denosumab (case series) that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The quality assessment revealed an overall moderate quality of evidence among the studies. Results demonstrated that patients with a history of bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis are not at increased risk of implant failure in terms of osseointegration. However, all patients with a history of bisphosphonate treatment, whether taken orally for osteoporosis or intravenously for malignancy, appear to be at risk of ‘implant surgery-triggered’ MRONJ. In contrast, the risk of MRONJ in patients treated with denosumab for osteoporosis was found to be negligible. In conclusion, general and specialist dentists should exercise caution when planning dental implant therapy in patients with a history of bisphosphonate and denosumab drug therapy. Importantly, all patients with a history of bisphosphonates are at risk of MRONJ, necessitating this to be included in the informed consent obtained prior to implant placement. The James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry Honours program and the Australian Dental Research Foundation Colin Cormie Grant were the primary sources of funding for this systematic review.


Author(s):  
Titus Lalith Antony P ◽  
Balaji Ganesh S ◽  
Jothi Priya A

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e38-e46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
Fadi Ata-Ali ◽  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Yuan ◽  
Qiu-Chan Xiong ◽  
Megha Gupta ◽  
Rosa María López-Pintor ◽  
Xiao-Lei Chen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 789-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rejane Faria Ribeiro-Rotta ◽  
Christina Lindh ◽  
Andrea Castro Pereira ◽  
Madeleine Rohlin

Author(s):  
Mohamed Tharwat Hamed ◽  
Hisham Abdullah Mously ◽  
Moayyad Motaz Ghulman ◽  
Ghada Hussein Naguib

Abstract Objective: The present study explains the success and failure of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue by conducting a systematic review analysis. Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted to carry out systematic review using different scholarly platforms and libraries. A total of 12 studies published within the past 20-year time (1999-2019) were included following the inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the PRISMA guidelines. Additionally, the study outcomes were evaluated to determine their perceptions regarding the role of dental implant diameter in influencing the implant’s fatigue performance. Results: The implant diameter can be categorized into wide diameter (5-6 mm), regular diameter (3.75-4 mm), and small/narrow diameter (3-3.4 mm). The narrow diameter implants are indicated through thin alveolar ridges and mesiodistal spaces (less than 7 mm). The implants with narrow diameter would offer greater risk of fatigue failure for clinical situations with significant functional loading. No significant differences were found either in success or failure of dental implant diameter on fatigue efficiency after 1-year and 3-year follow-up. Conclusion: The technical complication of dental implant include abutment screw loosening or fracture, abutment and superstructure fracture, and implant body fracture. The study has study has mainly focused on the impact of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue and reviewed a significant impact of dental implant diameter on the fatigue efficiency. Keywords: Dental Implants, Efficiency, Perception. Continuous...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document