scholarly journals Gamma-ray bursts: the isotropic-equivalent-energy function and the cosmic formation rate

2012 ◽  
Vol 423 (3) ◽  
pp. 2627-2632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Wei Wu ◽  
Dong Xu ◽  
Fu-Wen Zhang ◽  
Da-Ming Wei
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Zhi-Ying Liu ◽  
Fu-Wen Zhang ◽  
Si-Yuan Zhu

Abstract Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are brief, intense, gamma-ray flashes in the universe, lasting from a few milliseconds to a few thousand seconds. For short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs) with duration less than 2 seconds, the isotropic energy (E iso) function may be more scientifically meaningful and accurately measured than the luminosity (L p) function. In this work we construct, for the first time, the isotropic energy function of sGRBs and estimate their formation rate. First, we derive the L p – E p correlation using 22 sGRBs with known redshifts and well-measured spectra and estimate the pseduo redshifts of 334 Fermi sGRBs. Then, we adopt the Lynden-Bell c − method to study isotropic energy functions and formation rate of sGRBs without any assumption. A strong evolution of isotropic energy E iso ∝ (1+z)5.79 is found, which is comparable to that between L p and z. After removing effect of the cosmic evolution, the isotropic energy function can be reasonably fitted by a broken power law, which is ϕ ( E iso , 0 ) ∝ E iso , 0 − 0.45 for dim sGRBs and ϕ ( E iso , 0 ) ∝ E iso , 0 − 1.11 for bright sGRBs, with the break energy 4.92 × 1049 erg. We obtain the local formation rate of sGRBs is about 17.43 events Gpc−3 yr−1. If assuming a beaming angle is 6° to 26°, the local formation rate including off-axis sGRBs is estimated as ρ 0,all = 155.79 – 3202.35 events Gpc−3 yr−1.


2004 ◽  
Vol 611 (2) ◽  
pp. 1033-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Firmani ◽  
Vladimir Avila‐Reese ◽  
Gabriele Ghisellini ◽  
Alexander V. Tutukov

1998 ◽  
Vol 506 (2) ◽  
pp. L81-L84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Krumholz ◽  
S. E. Thorsett ◽  
Fiona A. Harrison

Galaxies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Orlando Luongo ◽  
Marco Muccino

Gamma-ray bursts are the most powerful explosions in the universe and are mainly placed at very large redshifts, up to z≃9. In this short review, we first discuss gamma-ray burst classification and morphological properties. We then report the likely relations between gamma-ray bursts and other astronomical objects, such as black holes, supernovae, neutron stars, etc., discussing in detail gamma-ray burst progenitors. We classify long and short gamma-ray bursts, working out their timescales, and introduce the standard fireball model. Afterwards, we focus on direct applications of gamma-ray bursts to cosmology and underline under which conditions such sources would act as perfect standard candles if correlations between photometric and spectroscopic properties were not jeopardized by the circularity problem. In this respect, we underline how the shortage of low-z gamma-ray bursts prevents anchor gamma-ray bursts with primary distance indicators. Moreover, we analyze in detail the most adopted gamma-ray burst correlations, highlighting their main differences. We therefore show calibration techniques, comparing such treatments with non-calibration scenarios. For completeness, we discuss the physical properties of the correlation scatters and systematics occurring during experimental computations. Finally, we develop the most recent statistical methods, star formation rate, and high-redshift gamma-ray burst excess and show the most recent constraints obtained from experimental analyses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (4) ◽  
pp. 4607-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Xuan Lan ◽  
Hou-Dun Zeng ◽  
Jun-Jie Wei ◽  
Xue-Feng Wu

ABSTRACT We study the luminosity function and formation rate of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by using a maximum likelihood method. This is the first time this method is applied to a well-defined sample of GRBs that is complete in redshift. The sample is composed of 99 bursts detected by the Swift satellite, 81 of them with measured redshift and luminosity for a completeness level of $82\, {\rm per\, cent}$. We confirm that a strong redshift evolution in luminosity (with an evolution index of $\delta =2.22^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$) or in density ($\delta =1.92^{+0.20}_{-0.21}$) is needed in order to reproduce the observations well. But since the predicted redshift and luminosity distributions in the two scenarios are very similar, it is difficult to distinguish between these two kinds of evolutions only on the basis of the current sample. Furthermore, we also consider an empirical density case in which the GRB rate density is directly described as a broken power-law function and the luminosity function is taken to be non-evolving. In this case, we find that the GRB formation rate rises like $(1+z)^{3.85^{+0.48}_{-0.45}}$ for $z\lesssim 2$ and is proportional to $(1+z)^{-1.07^{+0.98}_{-1.12}}$ for $z\gtrsim 2$. The local GRB rate is $1.49^{+0.63}_{-0.64}$ Gpc−3 yr−1. The GRB rate may be consistent with the cosmic star formation rate (SFR) at $z\lesssim 2$, but shows an enhancement compared to the SFR at $z\gtrsim 2$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document