The isotropic energy function and formation rate of short gamma-ray bursts

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Zhi-Ying Liu ◽  
Fu-Wen Zhang ◽  
Si-Yuan Zhu

Abstract Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are brief, intense, gamma-ray flashes in the universe, lasting from a few milliseconds to a few thousand seconds. For short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs) with duration less than 2 seconds, the isotropic energy (E iso) function may be more scientifically meaningful and accurately measured than the luminosity (L p) function. In this work we construct, for the first time, the isotropic energy function of sGRBs and estimate their formation rate. First, we derive the L p – E p correlation using 22 sGRBs with known redshifts and well-measured spectra and estimate the pseduo redshifts of 334 Fermi sGRBs. Then, we adopt the Lynden-Bell c − method to study isotropic energy functions and formation rate of sGRBs without any assumption. A strong evolution of isotropic energy E iso ∝ (1+z)5.79 is found, which is comparable to that between L p and z. After removing effect of the cosmic evolution, the isotropic energy function can be reasonably fitted by a broken power law, which is ϕ ( E iso , 0 ) ∝ E iso , 0 − 0.45 for dim sGRBs and ϕ ( E iso , 0 ) ∝ E iso , 0 − 1.11 for bright sGRBs, with the break energy 4.92 × 1049 erg. We obtain the local formation rate of sGRBs is about 17.43 events Gpc−3 yr−1. If assuming a beaming angle is 6° to 26°, the local formation rate including off-axis sGRBs is estimated as ρ 0,all = 155.79 – 3202.35 events Gpc−3 yr−1.

2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (4) ◽  
pp. 4607-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Xuan Lan ◽  
Hou-Dun Zeng ◽  
Jun-Jie Wei ◽  
Xue-Feng Wu

ABSTRACT We study the luminosity function and formation rate of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by using a maximum likelihood method. This is the first time this method is applied to a well-defined sample of GRBs that is complete in redshift. The sample is composed of 99 bursts detected by the Swift satellite, 81 of them with measured redshift and luminosity for a completeness level of $82\, {\rm per\, cent}$. We confirm that a strong redshift evolution in luminosity (with an evolution index of $\delta =2.22^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$) or in density ($\delta =1.92^{+0.20}_{-0.21}$) is needed in order to reproduce the observations well. But since the predicted redshift and luminosity distributions in the two scenarios are very similar, it is difficult to distinguish between these two kinds of evolutions only on the basis of the current sample. Furthermore, we also consider an empirical density case in which the GRB rate density is directly described as a broken power-law function and the luminosity function is taken to be non-evolving. In this case, we find that the GRB formation rate rises like $(1+z)^{3.85^{+0.48}_{-0.45}}$ for $z\lesssim 2$ and is proportional to $(1+z)^{-1.07^{+0.98}_{-1.12}}$ for $z\gtrsim 2$. The local GRB rate is $1.49^{+0.63}_{-0.64}$ Gpc−3 yr−1. The GRB rate may be consistent with the cosmic star formation rate (SFR) at $z\lesssim 2$, but shows an enhancement compared to the SFR at $z\gtrsim 2$.


10.14311/1324 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kovács ◽  
Z. Bagoly ◽  
L. G. Balázs ◽  
I. Horváth ◽  
P. Veres

In the case of Gamma Ray Bursts with measured redshift, we can calculate the k-correction to get the fluence and energy that were actually produced in the comoving system of the GRB. To achieve this we have to use well-fitted parameters of GRB spectrum, available in the GCN database. The output of the calculations is the comoving isotropic energy Eiso, but this is not the endpoint: this data can be useful forestimating the ΩM parameter of the Universe and for making a GRB Hubble diagram usig Amati’s relation.


1998 ◽  
Vol 294 (1) ◽  
pp. L13-L17 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. M. J. Wijers ◽  
J. S. Bloom ◽  
J. S. Bagla ◽  
P. Natarajan

Author(s):  
Joshua S. Bloom

This chapter focuses on how gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are emerging as unique tools in the study of broad areas of astronomy and physics by virtue of their special properties. The unassailable fact about GRBs that makes them such great probes is that they are fantastically bright and so can be seen to the farthest reaches of the observable Universe. In parallel with the ongoing study of GRB events and progenitors, new lines of inquiry have burgeoned: using GRBs as unique probes of the Universe in ways that are almost completely divorced from the nature of GRBs themselves. Topics discussed include studies of gas, dust, and galaxies; the history of star formation; measuring reionization and the first objects in the universe; neutrinos, gravitational waves, and cosmic rays; quantum gravity and the expansion of the universe; and the future of GRBs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (4) ◽  
pp. 5823-5832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M Lloyd-Ronning ◽  
Aycin Aykutalp ◽  
Jarrett L Johnson

ABSTRACT We examine the relationship between a number of long gamma-ray burst (lGRB) properties (isotropic emitted energy, luminosity, intrinsic duration, jet opening angle) and redshift. We find that even when accounting for conservative detector flux limits, there appears to be a significant correlation between isotropic equivalent energy and redshift, suggesting cosmological evolution of the lGRB progenitor. Analysing a sub-sample of lGRBs with jet opening angle estimates, we find the beaming-corrected lGRB emitted energy does not correlate with redshift, but jet opening angle does. Additionally, we find a statistically significant anticorrelation between the intrinsic prompt duration and redshift, even when accounting for potential selection effects. We also find that, for a given redshift, isotropic energy is positively correlated with intrinsic prompt duration. None of these GRB properties appear to be correlated with galactic offset. From our selection-effect-corrected redshift distribution, we estimate a co-moving rate density for lGRBs, and compare this to the global cosmic star formation rate (SFR). We find the lGRB rate mildly exceeds the global star formation rate between a redshift of 3 and 5, and declines rapidly at redshifts above this (although we cannot constrain the lGRB rate above a redshift of about 6 due to sample incompleteness). We find the lGRB rate diverges significantly from the SFR at lower redshifts. We discuss both the correlations and lGRB rate density in terms of various lGRB progenitor models and their apparent preference for low-metallicity environments.


2003 ◽  
Vol 591 (2) ◽  
pp. L91-L94 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mszros ◽  
M. J. Rees

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document