Impact of post-transplant anemia on patient and graft survival rates after kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nassim Kamar ◽  
Lionel Rostaing ◽  
Sophie Ignace ◽  
Emmanuel Villar
Author(s):  
Elisabeth L. Metry ◽  
Liza M. M. van Dijk ◽  
Hessel Peters-Sengers ◽  
Michiel J.S. Oosterveld ◽  
Jaap W. Groothoff ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is characterized by hepatic overproduction of oxalate and often results in kidney failure. Liver-kidney transplantation is recommended, either combined (CLKT) or sequentially performed (SLKT). The merits of SLKT and the place of an isolated kidney transplant (KT) in selected patients are unsettled. We systematically reviewed the literature focusing on patient and graft survival rates in relation to the chosen transplant strategy. Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase using a broad search string, consisting of the terms ‘transplantation’ and ‘hyperoxaluria’. Studies reporting on at least four transplanted patients were selected for quality assessment and data extraction. Results We found 51 observational studies from 1975 to 2020, covering 756 CLKT, 405 KT and 89 SLKT, and 51 pre-emptive liver transplantations (PLT). Meta-analysis was impossible due to reported survival probabilities with varying follow-up. Two individual high-quality studies showed an evident kidney graft survival advantage for CLKT versus KT (87% vs. 14% at 15 years, p<0.05) with adjusted HR for graft failure of 0.14 (95% confidence interval: 0.05–0.41), while patient survival was similar. Three other high-quality studies reported 5-year kidney graft survival rates of 48–89% for CLKT and 14–45% for KT. PLT and SLKT yielded 1-year patient and graft survival rates up to 100% in small cohorts. Conclusions Our study suggests that CLKT leads to superior kidney graft survival compared to KT. However, evidence for merits of SLKT or for KT in pyridoxine-responsive patients was scarce, which warrants further studies, ideally using data from a large international registry.


2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Ryoichi Imamura ◽  
Ryo Tanaka ◽  
Ayumu Taniguchi ◽  
Shigeaki Nakazawa ◽  
Taigo Kato ◽  
...  

Kidney transplantation can prevent renal failure and associated complications in patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite the good quality of life, de novo cancers after kidney transplantation are a major complication impacting survival and there is an urgent need to establish immunosuppressive protocols to prevent de novo cancers. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study of 2002 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1965 and 2020 to examine patient and graft survival rates and cumulative cancer incidence in the following groups categorized based on specific induction immunosuppressive therapies: group 1, antiproliferative agents and steroids; group 2, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), antiproliferative agents and steroids; group 3, CNIs, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids; and group 4, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors including everolimus, CNIs, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The patient and graft survival rates were significantly higher in groups 3 and 4. The cumulative cancer incidence rate significantly increased with the use of more potent immunosuppressants, and the time to develop cancer was shorter. Only one patient in group 4 developed de novo cancer. Potent immunosuppressants might improve graft survival rate while inducing de novo cancer after kidney transplantation. Our data also suggest that everolimus might suppress cancer development after kidney transplantation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilli Kirkeskov ◽  
Rasmus Carlsen ◽  
Thomas Lund ◽  
Niels-Henrik Buus

Abstract Background: Patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation experience difficulties maintaining employ­­ment due to the condition itself as well as the treatment. We aimed to establish the rate of employment before and after initiation of dialysis and after kidney transplantation and to identify predictors of employment during dialysis and post-transplant.Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, PRISMA, for studies that included employment rate in adults receiving dialysis or a kidney transplant. The literature search included cross sectional or cohort studies published in English in the period from January 1966 to August 2020 in the databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Data of employment rate, study population, age, gender, educational level, dialysis duration, kidney donor, ethnicity, dialysis modality, waiting time for transplantation, diabetes, and depression were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis for predictors for employment and odds ratio; confidence intervals; and test for heterogeneity were calculated using Chi-squared statistics and I2. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020188853.Results. 33 studies with 162,059 participants during dialysis and 31 studies with 137,742 participants receiving kidney transplantation. Dialysis patients were on average 52.6 years old (range 16-79), 60.3% males and kidney transplant patients 46.7 years old (range 18-78), 59.8% males. The employment rate (weighted mean) for dialysis patients was 26.3% (range 10.5-59.7%); pre-transplant 36.9% (range 25-86%), and post-transplant 38.2% (range 14.2-85%). Predictors for employment during dialysis and post-transplant were male, non-diabetic, peritoneal dialysis, and higher educational level, and post-transplant: pre-transplant employment, younger age, transplantation with a living donor kidney, and without depression.Conclusions: Patients with kidney failure had a low employment rate during dialysis, pre- and post-transplant. Kidney failure patients should be supported through a combination of clinical and social measures to ensure they remain in work.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Coche ◽  
Ben Sprangers ◽  
Steven Van Laecke ◽  
Laurent Weekers ◽  
Vicky De Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Recurrence of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) glomerulonephritis in the kidney graft is a rare event, described in limited case reports and registry analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate in a large cohort of patients with detailed data collection and long follow-up the risk of recurrence of anti-GBM disease and graft loss caused by recurrence, the risk factors associated with clinical recurrence and the long-term patient and graft survival. Method Multicenter retrospective study. Inclusion criteria: patients with anti-GBM glomerulonephritis transplanted with a kidney between 1977 and 2015. Exclusion criteria: systemic vasculitis (except ANCA), lupus erythematosus and cryoglobulinemia. Clinical recurrence was defined as reappearance of signs of glomerulonephritis along with histological signs of proliferative glomerulonephritis and linear IgG staining on kidney biopsy, with or without anti-GBM antibodies. Results Fifty-three patients were included. Clinical recurrence in a first kidney transplant occurred in only one patient five years after transplantation -a prevalence rate of 1.9%- in the context of cessation of immunosuppressive drugs. The graft was lost due to recurrence. Histological recurrence with linear IgG staining on kidney biopsy in the absence of histologic signs of proliferative glomerulonephritis was observed in four patients, in the context of cellular rejection. Two patients lost their kidney graft from severe acute rejection; the others fully recovered. Patient survival was 100%, 94% and 89% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Overall, death-censored first graft survival rates were 88%, 83% and 79% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Conclusion Recurrence rate of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis after transplantation is very low, and associated with graft loss. The long-term patient and graft survival rates are excellent.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 831-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Fontaine ◽  
Laurent Alric ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Benjamin Legendre ◽  
Alexandre Louvet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document