Effects of subanaesthetic and anaesthetic doses of sevoflurane on regional cerebral blood flow in healthy volunteers. A positron emission tomographic study

2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1268-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Schlunzen ◽  
M. S. Vafaee ◽  
G. E. Cold ◽  
M. Rasmussen ◽  
J. F. Nielsen ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 553-562
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Yada ◽  
Hideo Onishi ◽  
Masahiro Miyai ◽  
Kentarou Ozasa ◽  
Takashi Katsube ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron D. Ginsberg ◽  
Alan H. Lockwood ◽  
Raul Busto ◽  
Ronald D. Finn ◽  
Cathy M. Butler ◽  
...  

A simplified mathematical model is described for the measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by positron emission tomography in man, based on a modification of the autoradiographic strategy originally developed for experimental animal studies. A modified ramp intravenous infusion of radiolabeled tracer is used; this results in a monotonically increasing curvilinear arterial activity curve that may be accurately described by a polynomial of low degree (= z). Integrated cranial activity C̄ B is measured in regions of interest during the latter portion of the tracer infusion period (times T1 to T2). It is shown that [Formula: see text] where each of the terms A x is a readily evaluated function of the blood flow rate constant k, the brain:blood partition coefficient for the tracer, the cranial activity integration limits T1 and T2, the coefficients of the polynomial describing the arterial curve, and an iteration factor n that is chosen to yield the desired degree of precision. This relationship permits generation of a table of C̄ B vs. k, thus facilitating on-line computer solution for blood flow. This in vivo autoradiographic paradigm was validated in a series of rats by comparing it to the classical autoradiographic strategy developed by Kety and associates. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between blood flow values obtained by the two methods: CBF in vivo = CBFclassical X 0.99 − 0.02 (units in ml g−1 min−1; correlation coefficient r = 0.966).


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunari Ishii ◽  
Takafumi Uemura ◽  
Naokazu Miyamoto ◽  
Toshiki Yoshikawa ◽  
Toshiaki Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document