Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caspar Rose
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 236-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Chen ◽  
Woon Sau Leung ◽  
Kevin P. Evans

2021 ◽  
pp. 031289622098359
Author(s):  
Kuo-Pin Yang ◽  
Christine Chou ◽  
Gavin M Schwarz

With a growth in shareholder activism, the influence of shareholders on the make-up and selection of board members is increasingly acknowledged but under-explored. Focusing on one element of activism, this article considers the adoption and use of electronic voting (e-voting) for board elections in emerging economies, testing its effect on the excess control of controlling shareholders. Using a sample of board elections at 809 publicly listed Taiwanese companies, results challenge convention on governance and shareholder democracy. We show that adopting e-voting counterintuitively leads to greater levels of excess control which subsequently harms firm performance—an effect more pronounced in firms characterized by a pyramidal control structure and family-controlled firms. Findings offer an alternative view on shareholder democracy, revisiting expectations of benefits accrued from e-voting. JEL Classification: M10, L21, L25


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  

This study examines whether board diversity affects firm performance. We investigate this study using panel data of a sample of S&P 500 firms during a 12 year period. After controlling for industry, firm size, and other board composition variables, we find that all three board diversity variables of interest – gender, ethnicity, and age have a significant influence on firm performance. While ethnicity and age have a positive influence on firm performance, it was found that gender has a negative influence. Implications for future research are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document