Unemployment Insurance or Individual Savings Accounts: Can Chile'S New Scheme Serve as a Model for Other Developing Countries?

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Sehnbruch
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 102565
Author(s):  
Fernando Cirelli ◽  
Emilio Espino ◽  
Juan M. Sánchez

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Widana ◽  
Ketut Jayanegara

Unemployment insurance is designed to overcome some of the financial problems faced by workers who have been involuntarily terminated from their jobs. The benefit insurance is financed based on the contributory from an employer, employee or government in recent times, some developing countries have been establishing unemployment insurance. This research aims to analyze the unemployment insurance products in Indonesia. Especially to analyze the financial viability of the product. The method used is the equivalence premium principle. Based on data sourced from BPJS Ketenagakerjaan and a claim rate of 10%, it is found that a premium rate of 5% of insured wages would support a benefit level of 50% of the wages for 43 weeks. This premium rate would also support 70% of the wages for 32 weeks. Meanwhile, the premium rate of 1% of the participant wages would guarantee a benefit level of 50% for 6 weeks.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1302-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofer Setty

Abstract Unemployment accounts are mandatory individual savings accounts that can be used only during unemployment or retirement. Unlike unemployment insurance, unemployment accounts solve the moral hazard problem but provide no public insurance to workers. I study a hybrid system that borrows from concepts of both unemployment insurance and unemployment accounts, in which workers are mandated to save when employed and can withdraw from the account when unemployed. Once the account is exhausted, the unemployed worker receives unemployment benefits. This hybrid policy provides insurance to workers more efficiently than an unemployment insurance system because it provides government benefits selectively. As a consequence, young workers can reduce their precautionary savings and better smooth their consumption over the life cycle. Calibrating the model to the US economy, I find that, relative to an optimal unemployment insurance system, the optimal hybrid policy leads to a welfare gain of 2.4%, measured as consumption equivalent variation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Reyes Hartley ◽  
Jan C. van Ours ◽  
Milan Vodopivec

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document