Activity, daily movements and home range of an Ichneumon or Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) in southern Spain

2009 ◽  
Vol 207 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Delibes ◽  
J. F. Beltran
1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Palomares

Home-range size has been found to be related to body mass of some animals both across species and within species when the spatial strategies of the sexes differ. I studied home-range size in a polygynous carnivore, the Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon), and compared observed home-range size with predictions based on body mass. First, I tested whether mongooses actually exhibited site fidelity (for daily and multiday periods). Mongooses always showed site fidelity for a multiday home range, but in only 59% of the cases for daily home range. Adult males exhibited less daily site fidelity than did adult females or young. Multiday home-range size was similar among age–sex classes, but males had significantly more core areas than females or young. Multiday home-range size was positively correlated with body mass for adult males (r2 = 0.98, P = 0.0122) and negatively correlated with body mass of adult females (r2 = 0.40, P = 0.0374). Differences in these relationships and daily site fidelity between adult males and females suggest that the spatial strategies of male and female Egyptian mongooses are different, with the larger females defending the areas richer in resources and the larger males having more access to females.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 808 ◽  
Author(s):  
André C. Pereira ◽  
Victor Bandeira ◽  
Carlos Fonseca ◽  
Mónica V. Cunha

Recently, we unveiled taxonomical and functional differences in Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) gut microbiota across sex and age classes by microbial profiling. In this study, we generate, through culturomics, extended baseline information on the culturable bacterial and fungal microbiome of the species using the same specimens as models. Firstly, this strategy enabled us to explore cultivable microbial community differences across sexes and to ascertain the influence exerted by biological and environmental contexts of each host in its microbiota signature. Secondly, it permitted us to compare the culturomics and microbial profiling approaches and their ability to provide information on mongoose gut microbiota. In agreement with microbial profiling, culturomics showed that the core gut cultivable microbiota of the mongoose is dominated by Firmicutes and, as previously found, is able to distinguish sex- and age class-specific genera. Additional information could be obtained by culturomics, with six new genera unveiled. Richness indices and the Shannon index were concordant between culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches, highlighting significantly higher values when using microbial profiling. However, the Simpson index underlined higher values for the culturomics-generated data. These contrasting results were due to a differential influence of dominant and rare taxa on those indices. Beta diversity analyses of culturable microbiota showed similarities between adults and juveniles, but not in the data series originated from microbial profiling. Additionally, whereas the microbial profiling indicated that there were several bioenvironmental features related to the bacterial gut microbiota of the Egyptian mongoose, a clear association between microbiota and bioenvironmental features could not be established through culturomics. The discrepancies found between the data generated by the two methodologies and the underlying inferences, both in terms of β-diversity and role of bioenvironmental features, confirm that culture-independent, sequence-based methods have a higher ability to assess, at a fine scale, the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on the microbial community composition of mongoose’ gut. However, when used in a complementary perspective, this knowledge can be expanded by culturomics.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0133768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Barros ◽  
João Carvalho ◽  
Maria João Ramos Pereira ◽  
Joaquim P. Ferreira ◽  
Carlos Fonseca

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natividad Pérez-Santigosa ◽  
Judith Hidalgo-Vila ◽  
Carmen Díaz-Paniagua

Check List ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-599
Author(s):  
Lourens H. Swanepoel ◽  
Daan Loock ◽  
Wayne S. Matthews ◽  
Kevin W. Emslie

The current geographical distribution of the Egyptian Mongoose or Large Grey Mongoose, Herpestes ichneumon (Linnaeus, 1758), in South Africa is limited to the south-eastern coastal and eastern sections of the country. One recent sighting in the central part of the country suggested a wider geographical distribution. In this study, we report on confirmed sightings of the Egyptian Mongoose on consecutive years in the central part (at Sasol’s Synfuels Plant in Secunda) of the country. Our sightings thus expand the distribution of the Egyptian Mongoose in South Africa to include some sections of the central to eastern part of the country.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedan Kabuu Ngatia ◽  
Paul Waswa Webala ◽  
Mugo J. Mware ◽  
Thomas M. Butynski ◽  
Yvonne A. Jong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document