Occurrence of bats in northernmost Sweden (65°N) and their feeding ecology in summer

1992 ◽  
Vol 227 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rydell
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
JG Calado ◽  
SN Veríssimo ◽  
VH Paiva ◽  
R Ramos ◽  
PT Vaz ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1284-1292
Author(s):  
Nan LIN ◽  
Yazhou JIANG ◽  
Xingwei YUAN ◽  
Jing GUO ◽  
Jianzhong LING ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromi Kayama Watanabe ◽  
Chong Chen ◽  
Benny K. K. Chan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lykke Kristensen ◽  
Esben Moland Olsen ◽  
Even Moland ◽  
Halvor Knutsen ◽  
Peter Grønkjær ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Tiralla ◽  
Maika Holzapfel ◽  
Hermann Ansorge

AbstractThe increasing animosity towards wolves (Canislupus) by livestock-keeping nomads in Mongolia and the accompanying conflicts highlight the urgent need for knowledge about the feeding behavior of wolves, since information on the feeding ecology of wolves in Mongolia is rare, especially in the mountain taiga and mountain forest steppe regions of Northern Mongolia. Those regions are characterized by a relatively high wildlife diversity and are sparsely populated by humans. To face this problem, 137 wolf scats were collected in the Khentii Mountain range in Northern Mongolia between 2008 and 2012. Almost all wolf faeces contained remnants of wild ungulates, which made up 89% of the consumed biomass. Siberian roe deer (Capreoluspygargus) was the most important and positively selected prey species. It was followed by red deer (Cervuselaphus) and wild boar (Susscrofa), which was negatively selected by wolves. Wolves also fed on buffer prey species such as lagomorphs and small mammals. No evidence of domestic ungulates was found in the wolf diet. Thus, near-natural habitats with a diverse fauna of wild animals are important to limit livestock depredation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Vanalderweireldt ◽  
P Sirois ◽  
M Mingelbier ◽  
G Winkler

Abstract After being extirpated from the St. Lawrence River in the 1960s, striped bass (Morone saxatilis) were reintroduced to the estuary in 2002 and by 2008, they were naturally reproducing. To document the habitat use and feeding ecology of this reintroduced population, we examined the gut contents of 333 larvae and juveniles. Samples were collected in four estuarine habitats in 2014: the upstream freshwater section (UP), the oligohaline (O-ETM) and the mesohaline (M-ETM) estuarine turbidity maximum zones, and the downstream polyhaline section (DOWN). In June, pelagic larvae developed in the UP and the O-ETM, feeding mainly on copepods such as Eurytemora affinis. The O-ETM exhibited better suitable feeding conditions compared to the UP, likely due to the presence of Bosmina sp. as a primary prey. After July, striped bass shifted to larger prey items, consuming mainly dipteran pupa in upstream littoral habitats and gammarids and mysids in downstream habitats. In the early summer, the UP provided a high-quality nursery habitat and as the season progressed, the smallest juveniles dispersed downstream and improved their feeding success by exploiting a new feeding niche. This observation suggests that being distributed throughout the estuary may increase the potential survival of striped bass early life stages.


2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1273-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Teague O’Mara ◽  
Cathriona M. Hickey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document