Parent?offspring associations in wintering brent geese: parental investment or mutual assistance?

2007 ◽  
Vol 272 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tinkler ◽  
W. I. Montgomery ◽  
R. W. Elwood
Author(s):  
Eric T. Steiner ◽  
N. Clayton Silver ◽  
Pam Hall ◽  
Chantal Downing ◽  
Dominic Hurton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigal Tifferet ◽  
Sharon Jorev ◽  
Rinat Nasanovitz
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Natalia Tańska ◽  
Rafał Czechowski ◽  
Konrad Leniowski ◽  
Ewa Węgrzyn
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216
Author(s):  
Georgia Papucharova

AbstractEuropean evidence law is a quite sensitive topic and has always been the cause of much debate by practitioners and academics. Theoretical and physical borders do not matter for transnational crime. The intensive mobility of people and the evolution of world trade with goods and services create favorable conditions for the cross-border crime to develop. Therefore, it is of a great importance to take far-reaching steps to an upgraded mechanism for obtaining evidence in and from the Member States. This article examines the application of two mutual legal assistance instruments – the request for mutual assistance, which was established by the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959, the EU Mutual Legal Assistance Convention of2000 with its 2001 Protocol, and Arts. 48 to 53 of the Schengen Agreement, and the European Investigation Order introduced by the Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. The main objective of this research is to emphasize the advantages and disadvantages of both judicial cooperation mechanisms. A comparative analysis of both operational tools is an appropriate way to assess which one is related to more procedural savings and how both of them deal with the protection of human rights. Thus, the modern instruments for judicial cooperation in the area of transnational evidence-gathering as an international response to crimes with cross-border dimensions can be adequately valued.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Nisrina Puspitasari

This training is aimed to build character education especially self-reliance, character, mutual assistance, teamwork, entrepreneurship to Kalangan 184 Surakarta students. The age of students in elementary school is the golden age in mental development so it making possible to build character education based on self-reliance, mutual assistance, team work and entrepreneurship. Methods used in this training are demonstration, mentoring, and hands-on practice. In “Adol”(Ajar Adol) program, the activities which is carried out is buying and selling practice with consumer objects that is another students in Kalangan 184 elementary school Surakarta. The objectives of the implementation of this “Adol” (Ajar Adol) Program are 25 students of Kalangan 184 Elementary School Surakarta. The guides of this program are Bhineka team of Students Creativity Program. Besides Bhineka team of Students Creativity Program, parents of the students and teachers also involved to guide the students. Outcomes and results of the implantation of this program is the students can learn and do buying and selling activity which is give more advantage to sharp and build self-reliance, character, mutual assistance, teamwork, entrepreneurship


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document