Body Objectification, Social Pressure, and Disordered Eating Behavior in College Women: The Role of Sorority Membership

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Basow ◽  
Kelly A. Foran ◽  
Jamila Bookwala
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rui Gomes ◽  
Clara Simães ◽  
Olga Dias ◽  
Catarina Almeida ◽  
Sónia Gonçalves

Abstract There is mixed evidence for the relationship between increased levels of the drive for muscularity (DFM) and disordered eating behavior in males, therefore this study analysed the relationship between DFM and disordered eating behavior, giving particular relevance to the patterns of cognitive appraisal. A convenience sample was recruited from fitness centres and sport clubs with 308 participants, all males. Losing muscular mass represented a negative experience for participants, promoting a higher perception of threat appraisal. In addition, losing muscular mass was related to more muscularity-oriented behaviors and disordered eating behavior. Cognitive appraisal mediates the relation between DFM and disordered eating behavior. The results highlight the role of cognitive appraisal in DFM and disordered eating behavior in males in sport contexts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 8-27
Author(s):  
Monika Aleksė ◽  
Kristina Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė

Various research on sexual harassment and gender harassment confirms the adverse effects on a person's physical and emotional health (Shrier, 1990), but so far, little is known about the impact of sexual harassment and gender harassment on one's body objectification and links to disordered eating behavior. Sexual harassment and gender harassment are not only based on gender stereotypes but also play an essential role in supporting gender norms in society by regulating what is seen as acceptable and unacceptable behavior, and appearance for gender. According to the theory of body objectification (Fredrickson, Roberts, 1997), both forms of gender discrimination can induce attention to one's body and appearance, which ultimately can lead to reduced satisfaction of one's body (Szymanski et al. 2011). Since body dissatisfaction is one of the leading causes of eating disorders (Brechan, Kvalem, 2015; Cruz-Sáez et al. 2018), it is important to have a better understanding of sexual harassment and gender harassment relationship with body objectification and disordered eating behavior. The study aims to assess the relationships between sexual harassment and gender harassment experiences, body-objectification, and disordered eating behavior tendencies. 181 (23 males, 158 females) aged 18-38 (M=24.12) participated in this research. Sexual Harassment Experience Questionnaire (Fitzgerald et al. 1998) was used to measure both Unwanted Sexual Attention (Cronbach α – 0,893) and Quid Pro Quo sexual harassment (Cronbach α – 0,876), and Gender Harassment experience (Cronbach α – 0,868). Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (McKinley et al. 1996) was used to measure body objectification: Body Shame (Cronbach α – 0,825) and Body Surveillance (Cronbach α – 0,804).  The Eating Attitudes Test (Garner et al. 1979) was used to evaluate disordered eating behavior tendencies: Dieting (Cronbach α – 0,924), Bulimia and Food Preoccupation (Cronbach α – 0,725) and Oral Control (Cronbach α – 0,714). The results revealed significant sexual harassment and gender harassment experience differences between genders showing that women report significantly higher results of all forms of sexual harassment and gender harassment than men. Data analysis also revealed a statistically significant relationship between higher results of sexual harassment, gender harassment experience, and more pronounced disordered eating tendencies and higher body objectification. Data analysis has shown that gender harassment experience is a significant prognostic factor for higher body surveillance and body shame results, more frequent dieting.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nicole Rider ◽  
Rylan J. Testa ◽  
Nancy A. Haug ◽  
Jayme Peta ◽  
Kimberly F. Balsam

Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Bulik ◽  
Patrick F. Sullivan ◽  
Frances A. Carter ◽  
Peter R. Joyce

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Solfrid Bratland-Sanda ◽  
Merethe Pauline Nilsson ◽  
Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document