scholarly journals Ambulatory Subspecialty Visits in a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1755-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Vernacchio ◽  
Jennifer M. Muto ◽  
Gregory Young ◽  
Wanessa Risko
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e478
Author(s):  
Joel R. Davidson ◽  
David R. Karas ◽  
Michael T. Bigham

2022 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143
Author(s):  
Sarah Wood ◽  
Jungwon Min ◽  
Vicky Tam ◽  
Julia Pickel ◽  
Danielle Petsis ◽  
...  

Objectives. To identify associations between patient race and annual chlamydia screening among adolescent females. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study of females aged 15 to 19 years in a 31-clinic pediatric primary care network in Pennsylvania and New Jersey from 2015 through 2019. Using mixed-effect logistic regressions, we estimated associations between annual chlamydia screening and patient (race/ethnicity, age, previous chlamydia screening and infection, insurance type) and clinic (size, setting) characteristics. We decomposed potential effects of clinician’s implicit racial bias and screening, using covariates measuring the proportion of Black patients in each clinician’s practice. Results. There were 68 935 well visits among 37 817 females, who were 28.8% Black and 25.8% Medicaid insured. The mean annual chlamydia screening rate was 11.1%. Black females had higher odds of screening (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51, 1.84) than did White females. In the clinician characteristics model, individual clinicians were more likely to screen their Black versus non-Black patients (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.65, 2.15). Conclusions. Racial bias may affect screening practices and should be addressed in future interventions, given the critical need to increase population-level chlamydia screening.(Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):135–143. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306498 )


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Edwardson ◽  
Bita A. Kash ◽  
Ramkumar Janakiraman

We examine the impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption on charge capture—the ability of providers to properly ensure that billable services are accurately recorded and reported for payment. Drawing on billing and practice management data from a large, integrated pediatric primary care network that was previously a paper-based organization, monthly encounter, charge, and collection data were collected from 2008 through 2013. Two-level fixed effects models were built to test the impact of EHR adoption on charge capture. The introduction of the EHR to the pediatric primary care network was independently associated with an $11.09 increase in average per patient charges, an $11.49 increase in average per patient collections, and an improvement in physicians’ charge-to-collection ratios. Despite high initial outlays and operating costs related to EHR adoption, these results suggest organizations may recoup many of these costs over the long term.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Bonett ◽  
Danielle Petsis ◽  
Nadia Dowshen ◽  
José Bauermeister ◽  
Sarah M. Wood

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Gerber ◽  
P. A. Prasad ◽  
A. Russell Localio ◽  
A. G. Fiks ◽  
R. W. Grundmeier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 958-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chén C. Kenyon ◽  
Mitchell G. Maltenfort ◽  
Rebecca A. Hubbard ◽  
Leah H. Schinasi ◽  
Anneclaire J. De Roos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jane C. Bittner ◽  
Nicole Thomas ◽  
Emily Trudell Correa ◽  
Jonathan Hatoun ◽  
Sara Donahue ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Fierro ◽  
M. Middleton ◽  
A. N. Smallwood ◽  
S. Rettig ◽  
C. Feudtner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document