Commentary: Novel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler: Dermal Gel Extra Physical Properties and Clinical Outcomes

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 1842
Author(s):  
JEAN CARRUTHERS
2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 1833-1841 ◽  
Author(s):  
GARY D. MONHEIT ◽  
LESLIE S. BAUMANN ◽  
MICHAEL H. GOLD ◽  
DAVID J. GOLDBERG ◽  
MITCHEL P. GOLDMAN ◽  
...  

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 948
Author(s):  
Nicola Zerbinati ◽  
Sabrina Sommatis ◽  
Cristina Maccario ◽  
Maria Chiara Capillo ◽  
Giulia Grimaldi ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are used to restore volume, hydration and skin tone in aesthetic medicine. HA fillers differ from each other due to their cross-linking technologies, with the aim to increase mechanical and biological activities. One of the most recent and promising cross-linkers is polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE), used by the company Matex Lab S.p.A., (Brindisi, Italy) to create the HA dermal filler PEGDE family. Over the last few years, several studies have been performed to investigate the biocompatibility and biodegradability of these formulations, but little information is available regarding their matrix structure, rheological and physicochemical properties related to their cross-linking technologies, the HA content or the degree of cross-linking. (2) Methods: Seven different injectable HA hydrogels were subjected to optical microscopic examination, cohesivity evaluation and rheological characterization in order to investigate their behavior. (3) Results: The analyzed cross-linked dermal fillers showed a fibrous “spiderweb-like” matrix structure, with each medical device presenting different and peculiar rheological features. Except for HA non cross-linked hydrogel 18 mg/mL, all showed an elastic and cohesive profile. (4) Conclusions: The comparative analysis with other literature works makes a preliminary characterization of these injectable medical devices possible.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-496
Author(s):  
Yong-Beom Park ◽  
Jun-Ho Kim ◽  
Chul-Won Ha ◽  
Dong-Hyun Lee

Background: Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has potential as a regenerative treatment for knee osteoarthritis, its efficacy varies. Compositional differences among types of PRP could affect clinical outcomes, but the biological characterization of PRP is lacking. Purpose: To assess the efficacy of intra-articular PRP injection in knee osteoarthritis as compared with hyaluronic acid (HA) injection and to determine whether the clinical efficacy of PRP is associated with its biological characteristics. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 110 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis received a single injection of leukocyte-rich PRP (1 commercial kit) or HA. Clinical data were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after injection. The primary endpoint was an improvement in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 6 months, and the secondary endpoints were improvements in scores based on the Patient Global Assessment, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Samsung Medical Center patellofemoral score. Cell counts and concentrations of growth factors and cytokines in the injected PRP were assessed to determine their association with clinical outcomes. Results: PRP showed significantly improvement in IKDC subjective scores at 6 months (11.5 in the PRP group vs 6.3 in the HA group; P = .029). There were no significant differences between groups in other clinical outcomes. The Patient Global Assessment score at 6 months was better in the PRP group ( P = .035). The proportion of patients who scored above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS at 6 months was significantly higher in the PRP group ( P = .044). Within the PRP group, the concentrations of platelet-derived growth factors were high in patients with a score above the MCID for VAS at 6 months. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the groups ( P > .05). Conclusion: PRP had better clinical efficacy than HA. High concentrations of growth factors were observed in patients who scored above the MCID for clinical outcomes in the PRP group. These findings indicate that concentration of growth factors needs to be taken into consideration for future investigations of PRP in knee osteoarthritis. Registration: NCT02211521 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 621-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy Kopera ◽  
Zrinka Ivezic-Schoenfeld ◽  
Ira G. Federspiel ◽  
Doris Grablowitz ◽  
Benjamin Gehl ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ilmira R. Gilmutdinova ◽  
Elena Kostromina ◽  
Regina D. Yakupova ◽  
Petr S. Eremin

The development of new biomaterials whose characteristics are as close as possible to the properties of living human tissues is one of the most promising areas of regenerative medicine. This work aimed at creating a bioplastic material based on collagen, elastin and hyaluronic acid and studying its structure and properties to assess the prospects for further use in clinical practice. Bioplastic material was obtained by mixing collagen, hyaluronic acid and elastin in predetermined proportions with distilled water. We treated the material with photochemical crosslinking to stabilize biofilm in a liquid medium and form a nanostructured scaffold. A commercial human skin fibroblast cell culture was used to assess the biomaterial cytotoxicity and biocompatibility. The visualization and studies of the biomaterial structure were performed using light and scanning electron microscopy. It has been shown that the obtained biomaterial is characterized by high resilience; it has also a high porosity. The co-culturing of the bioplastic material and human fibroblasts did not reveal any of its cytotoxic effects on cells in culture. It was shown that the biomaterial samples could maintain physical properties in the culture medium for more than 10 days, while the destruction of the matrix was observed 3–4 weeks after the beginning of incubation. Thus, the created biomaterial can be used on damaged skin areas due to its physical properties and structure. The use of the developed biomaterial provides effective conditions for good cell proliferation, which allows us to consider it as a promising wound cover for use in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document