Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Trigger Point Injections in Headache Management: Trigeminal Neuralgia Does Not Respond to Occipital Nerve Block

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1215-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randolph W. Evans
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Gregorio Giaccari ◽  
Francesco Coppolino ◽  
Caterina Aurilio ◽  
Valentina Esposito ◽  
Maria Caterina Pace ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the earliest recognized complications of regional anesthesia. It is a common complication after inadvertent dural puncture. When conservative management is ineffective, the Epidural Blood Patch (EBP) is the “gold standard” for the treatment of PDPH. Due to the potential complications of EBP, several alternatives have been promoted as peripheral nerve blocks.A systematic review of the use of regional anesthesia for PDPH is needed to identify an alternative method of pain management.Objectives: To systematically review literature to establish the efficacy and applicability of regional anesthesia used in the treatment of PDPH in the hospital setting.Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Trials Register were systematically searched in May 2020 for studies examining regional anesthesia for PDPH. The methodological quality of the studies and their results were appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and specific measurement properties criteria, respectively.Results: Nineteen studies evaluating peripheral nerve blocks for PDPH were included for a total of 221 patients. Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB), greater occipital nerve block (GONB) and lesser occipital nerve block (LONB) were performed. All participants reported NRS lower than 4 after peripheral nerve blocks at 1, 24 and 48 hours. Only patients who experienced PDPH after diagnostic lumbar puncture reported NRS ≥ 4 after 48 hours. No adverse event was reported after the execution of nerve blocks, except an occasionally discomfort related to the insertion of cotton-tip applicators intranasally for SPGB. 17% of patients underwent a second or more peripheral nerve block due to uncontrolled pain. In 30 participants, EBP was required; none of cases followed spinal anesthesia.Conclusion: Peripheral nerve blocks can be considered as analgesic options in the management of PDPH, as not all cases require EBP for successful treatment. Treatment of PDPH with peripheral nerve blocks seems to be a minimal invasive, easy and effective method, which can offer to patients when conservative management is ineffective.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 908-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Ertugrul Inan ◽  
Nurten Inan ◽  
Hanzade Aybuke Unal-Artık ◽  
Ceyla Atac ◽  
Gulcin Babaoglu

Objectives The importance and popularity of peripheral nerve block procedures have increased in the treatment of migraine. Greater occipital nerve (GON) block is a commonly used peripheral nerve block method, and there are numerous researches on its use in migraine treatment. Materials and methods A search of PubMed for English-language randomized controlled trials (RCT) and open studies on greater occipital nerve block between 1995 and 2018 was performed using greater occipital nerve, headache, and migraine as keywords. Results In total, 242 potentially relevant PubMed studies were found. A sum of 228 of them which were non-English articles and reviews, case reports, letters and meta-analyses were excluded. The remaining articles were reviewed, and 14 clinical trials, seven of which were randomized-controlled on greater occipital nerve block in migraine patients, were identified and reviewed. Conclusions Although clinicians commonly use greater occipital nerve block in migraine patients, the procedure has yet to be standardized. The present study reviewed the techniques, drugs and dosages, the frequency of administration, side effects, and efficacy of greater occipital nerve block in migraine patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Carvalho ◽  
Romy D. Yun ◽  
Edward R. Mariano

Background and Objectives: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide many additional benefits compared to single-injection peripheral nerve blocks (SPNB). However, the time and costs associated with CPNB provision have not been previously considered. The objective of this study was to compare the time required and estimated personnel costs associated with CPNB and SPNB. Methods: This IRB-exempt observational study involved provision of preoperative regional anesthesia procedures in a “block room” model by a dedicated team during routine clinical care. The primary outcome, the time to perform ultrasound-guided popliteal-sciatic blocks, was recorded prospectively. This time measurement was broken down into individual tasks: time to place monitors, prepare the equipment, scan and identify the target, perform the block, and clean up post-procedure. For peripheral nerve block catheters, time to insert, locate, and secure the catheter was also recorded. Cost estimates for physician time were determined using published national mean hourly wages. Results: Time measurements were recorded for 24 nerve block procedures (12 CPNB and 12 SPNB). The median (IQR; range) total time (seconds) taken to perform blocks was 1132 (1083-1290; 1060-1623) for CPNB versus 505 (409-589; 368-635) for SPNB (Table 1; p<0.001). The median (IQR) cost attributed to physician time during block performance was $35.20 ($33.66-$40.11) and $15.69 ($12.73-$18.32) for CPNB and SPNB, respectively. Conclusion: CPNB requires approximately 10 more minutes per procedure to perform when compared to SPNB. This additional time should be considered along with potential patient benefits and available resources when developing a regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine service.


Author(s):  
Depinder Kaur ◽  
Reena Mahajan ◽  
Shiv Kumar Singh ◽  
Suchitra Malhotra

Introduction: Faculty and Residents are trained in peripheral nerve blocks guided by blind technique, Peripheral Neuro Stimulator (PNS) or Ultrasound (USG) guided technique. But due to unavailability of USG machine in all institutes and requiring special training, techniques used for peripheral nerve blocks vary from institute to institute. Aim: To analyse the effect of anaesthesiologists’ experience on preferred technique and Local Anaesthetic (LA) volume used for brachial plexus nerve block retrospectively. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 129 adults American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients requiring brachial plexus nerve block for upper limb orthopaedic surgical anaesthesia for both elective and emergency surgery were divided into three groups for each year depending on technique for nerve block used. Group A: Received USG guided (Micromaxx Sonosite Inc, USA) brachial plexus nerve block. Group B: Received peripheral nerve stimulator (Inmed) guided brachial plexus nerve block. Group C: Received brachial plexus nerve block by traditional anatomical landmark based paraesthesia elicitation blind technique. Patients with inadequate surgical analgesia were given general anaesthesia and were categorised as failure rate. Year wise demographic data, type of technique used for giving brachial plexus nerve block, volume of drug used, failure rate, complications observed were collected and analysed by Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. Results: USG guided technique was the most prefered technique in both years (57.6%, n=38 in year 2018 and 49.2%, n=31 in year 2019). In remaining nearly half of the patients PNS and blind technique was used (PNS 24.2%, n=16 in year 2018 and 20.6%, n=13 in year 2019; blind technique 18.2%, n=12 in year 2018 and 30.2%, n=19 in year 2019). Significantly, less volume of LA drug (mL) was used in group A in year 2019 (16.43±6.07) than in year 2018 (22.34±4.75) (p<0.001). Failure rate in group A in year 2019 (3.2%) was significantly less than in year 2018 (5.2%), but the difference was insignificant in all three groups. In group A, no complications were observed in year 2019 while one incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was observed in year 2018, while in group B and C, complications were observed in both years. Conclusion: USG guided nerve block was the most preferred technique for nerve block in the study institute. In 24 months observation period, with increasing experience with USG there was significant increase in success rate and decrease in the volume of LA administered and complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document