Short- and Long-Term Follow-up of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion through Transradial Approach: Tips for Successful Procedure from a Single-Center Experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEI LIU ◽  
KENJI WAGATSUMA ◽  
MIKIHITO TODA ◽  
HIDEO AMANO ◽  
HIDEO NII ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term

scholarly journals Long-term prognosis of chronic total occlusion treated by successful percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Shuai Meng ◽  
Maolin Chen ◽  
Kesen Liu ◽  
Ruofei Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of CTO-PCI in patients with or without DM. Methods All relevant articles published in electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to August 7, 2020 were identified with a comprehensive literature search. Additionally, we defined major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) as the primary endpoint and used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express the pooled effects in this meta-analysis. Results Eleven studies consisting of 4238 DM patients and 5609 non-DM patients were included in our meta-analysis. For DM patients, successful CTO-PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACEs (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.82, p = 0.0001), all-cause death (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.56, p < 0.00001), and cardiac death (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.26–0.48, p < 0.00001) than CTO-medical treatment (MT) alone; however, this does not apply to non-DM patients. Subsequently, the subgroup analysis also obtained consistent conclusions. In addition, our study also revealed that non-DM patients may suffer less risk from MACEs (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.56, p = 0.03) than DM patients after successful CTO-PCI, especially in the subgroup with a follow-up period of less than 3 years (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.22–1.67, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Compared with CTO-MT alone, successful CTO-PCI was found to be related to a better long-term prognosis in DM patients but not in non-DM patients. However, compared with non-DM patients, the risk of MACEs may be higher in DM patients after successful CTO-PCI in the drug-eluting stent era, especially during a follow-up period shorter than 3 years.

Risk of cardiac and sudden death with and without revascularisation of a coronary chronic total occlusion

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (14) ◽  
pp. 1096-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosmo Godino ◽  
Alessia Giannattasio ◽  
Andrea Scotti ◽  
Luca Baldetti ◽  
Carlo Andrea Pivato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusions ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Infarct Related Artery ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Term Analysis

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term risk of cardiac death and sudden cardiac death (SCD) and/or sustained ventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) revascularised versus those with CTO not revascularised by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsFrom a cohort of 1357 CTO-PCI patients, 1162 patients who underwent CTO PCI attempt were included in this long-term analysis: 837 patients were revascularised by PCI (CTO-R group) and 325 were not revascularised (CTO-NR group). Primary adverse endpoint was the incidence of cardiac death; secondary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of SCD/SVAs.ResultsUp to 12-year follow-up (median 6 year), compared with CTO-R patients, those with CTO-NR had significantly higher rate of cardiac death (13%[43/325]vs6%[48/837]; p<0.001) and SCD/SVAs (7.5%[24/325]vs2.5%[20/837]; p<0.001). The risk of cardiac death and SCD/SVAs was mainly driven by the subgroup of infarct-related artery (IRA) CTO patients and was significantly higher only in IRA CTO-NR patients (18%vs7%, p<0.001, 14%vs5%, p=0.001; IRA CTO-NR vs IRA CTO-R, respectively). At multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis, CTO-NR remains one of the strongest independent predictors of higher risk of cardiac death and of SCD/SVAs in the overall population and in IRA CTO patients.ConclusionsAt long-term follow-up, patients with CTO not revascularised by PCI had worse outcomes compared with those with CTO revascularised, with >2-fold risk of cardiac death and threefold risk of SCD/SVAs. The presence of an infarct-related artery (IRA CTO) not revascularised identified the category of patients with the highest rate of adverse events .

Patient Selection and Procedural Considerations for Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Yohei Sotomi ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Rotational Atherectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Orbital Atherectomy ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Coronary Lesions ◽  
Calcified Coronary Lesions

Despite advances in technology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified coronary lesions remains challenging. Rotational atherectomy is one of the current therapeutic options to manage calcified lesions, but has a limited role in facilitating the dilation or stenting of lesions that cannot be crossed or expanded with other PCI techniques due to unfavourable clinical outcome in long-term follow-up. However the results of orbital atherectomy presented in the ORBIT I and ORBIT II trials were encouraging. In addition to these encouraging data, necessity for sufficient lesion preparation before implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds lead to resurgence in the use of atherectomy. This article summarises currently available publications on orbital atherectomy (Cardiovascular Systems Inc.) and compares them with rotational atherectomy.

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up of therapeutic efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in comparison to everolimus-eluting stent in treatment of chronic total occlusion guided by intracoronary imaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abdallah Eltahlawi ◽  
Abdel-Aziz Fouad Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Abdel-Salam Sherif ◽  
Khalid Abdel-Azeem Shokry ◽  
Islam Elsayed Shehata
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Intracoronary Imaging ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vascular Scaffold ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background We hypothesized that 1st generation everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) stent associated with less complication and less restenosis rate than everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization guided by intracoronary imaging. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and performance of BVS stent in CTO revascularization in comparison to EES guided by intracoronary imaging. Our prospective comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 CTO patients divided into two groups according to type of stent revascularization: group I (EES group): 40 (66.7%) patients and group II (BVS group): 20 (33.3%) patients. All patients were subjected to history taking, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, laboratory investigation, stress thallium study to assess viability before revascularization. Revascularization of viable CTO lesion guided by intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Then, long-term follow-up over 1 year clinically and by multi-slice CT coronary angiography (MSCT). Our clinical and angiographic endpoints were to detect any clinical or angiographic complications during the follow-up period. Results At 6 months angiographic follow-up, BVS group had not inferior angiographic parameters but without statistically significant difference (p = 0.566). At 12 months follow-up, there was no difference at end points between the two groups (p = 0.476). No differences were found at angiographic or clinical follow-up between BVS and EES. Conclusion This study shows that 1st generation everolimus-eluting BVS is non-inferior to EES for CTO revascularization. Further studies are needed to clearly state which new smaller footprint BVS, faster reabsorption, magnesium-based less thrombogenicity, and advanced mechanical properties is under development. We cannot dismiss the efficacy and safety of new BVS technology. Trial registration ZU-IRB#2498/3-12-2016 Registered 3 December 2016, email: [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document