Estimating carcass persistence and scavenging bias in a human-influenced landscape in western Alaska

2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Flint ◽  
Ellen W. Lance ◽  
Kristine M. Sowl ◽  
Tyrone F. Donnelly
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e0165608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Augusto Lima Santos ◽  
Sara M. Santos ◽  
Margarida Santos-Reis ◽  
Almir Picanço de Figueiredo ◽  
Alex Bager ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Villegas-Patraca ◽  
Samuel Macías-Sánchez ◽  
Ian MacGregor-Fors ◽  
Carlos Muñoz-Robles

Ecosphere ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e01966 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Borner ◽  
O. Duriez ◽  
A. Besnard ◽  
A. Robert ◽  
V. Carrere ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 291 ◽  
pp. 112664
Author(s):  
Dominic A.W. Henry ◽  
Wendy J. Collinson-Jonker ◽  
Harriet T. Davies-Mostert ◽  
Samantha K. Nicholson ◽  
Lizanne Roxburgh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 717 ◽  
Author(s):  
João J. S. Paula ◽  
Regina M. B. Bispo ◽  
Andreia H. Leite ◽  
Pedro G. S. Pereira ◽  
Hugo M. R. G. Costa ◽  
...  

Context To assess the real impact of human-made structures on bird and bat communities, a significant number of carcass-removal trials has been performed worldwide in recent decades. Recently, researchers have started to use camera traps to record carcasses exact removal time and better understand the factors that influence this event. Aims In our study, we endeavoured to identify the factors that significantly affect carcass-persistence time, such as (1) season, (2) scavenger guild, (3) type of carcass, (4) habitat and (5) weather conditions. Additionally, we aimed to assess the performance of camera-trapping technology in comparison to the conventional method typically used in carcass-removal trials. Methods We conducted two trials in two wind farms during early spring and during summer season. In each trial, we used 30 bird carcasses and 30 mice carcasses as surrogates for bats. Digital infrared camera traps were used to monitor each carcass. Chi-squared test was used to investigate differences between wind farms regarding the scavenger guild. A log-rank test was used to compare carcass-persistence times for both wind farms. Carcass-persistence times were analysed using both non-parametric and parametric survival models. Finally, we evaluated the percentage of carcasses removed during the day time and night time. Key results In our study area, carcass-persistence times were influenced by the scavenger guild present and by the exposure to rain. Camera traps allowed to record the exact removal time for the majority of the carcasses, reducing the number of visits to the study site about five times. However, there were also cases wherein loss of data occurred as a result of equipment flaws or camera theft. Conclusions Results demonstrated the importance of undertaking site-specific carcass-removal trials. Use of camera-trap methodology is a valid option, reducing displacement costs. Costs related to equipment purchase and the risk of camera theft should be taken into consideration. Implications When choosing camera-trapping, the main aspect to evaluate is the balance between the investment in equipment purchase and the cost savings through reduced displacement costs. Further studies are required concerning the real effects of the data collected on the accuracy of carcass-removal correction factor obtained.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Spencer ◽  
Thomas Newsome

ABSTRACT Dingoes (Canis dingo) are known for hunting and killing animals to meet their energetic requirements, but like almost all predators they also scavenge animal remains. To improve our understanding of dingo scavenging ecology, we investigated the role of abiotic and biotic factors in shaping carcass utilisation by dingoes and further determined whether dingo scavenging influenced carcass persistence in the landscape. To do so, we monitored visitation and scavenging by dingoes using remote cameras positioned on 119 kangaroo carcasses in open and closed canopy habitats and in warm and cool seasons. The carcasses were monitored across multiple study sites, which incorporated forest, alpine and desert ecoregions in Australia. We found that season played an important role in shaping carcass utilisation by dingoes, as well as carcass persistence. Warmer seasons increased the rate of carcass discovery 6.3-fold in the Forest study site and 4.8-fold in the Alpine study site, and also increased the time dingoes spent feeding on carcasses in the Alpine study site. Further, across all study sites, carcasses persisted at least 4.7 times longer in cool compared with warm seasons. On the other hand, carcass utilisation by dingoes was not influenced by habitat, although carcasses were more likely to persist in open compared with closed canopy habitats in the Alpine study site. Finally, our study showed that dingo scavenging may contribute to substantial carcass removal in certain contexts. Indeed, decreased carcass persistence in the Forest study site was evident in the cool season, when dingo scavenging occurred during the first two weeks of monitoring. The variability in results highlights the complexity of patterns in dingo scavenging and, more broadly, of vertebrate scavenging. It emphasises the need to consider multiple abiotic and biotic factors to properly understand the functional roles of different scavenger species. Longer-term studies with additional seasonal replicates may also yield a more detailed picture of the role of dingoes as apex scavengers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document