scholarly journals DEFICIENCY SCREENING FOR GENOMIC REGIONS WITH EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY OF THE SENSORY BRISTLES OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Evolution ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 2878-2890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo H. Takahashi ◽  
Yasukazu Okada ◽  
Kouhei Teramura
Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-282
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu

Abstract Interspecific cross is a powerful means to uncover hidden within- and between-species variation in populations. One example is a bristle loss phenotype of hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, although both the pure species have exactly the same pattern of bristle formation on the notum. There exists a large amount of genetic variability in the simulans populations with respect to the number of missing bristles in hybrids, and the variation is largely attributable to simulans X chromosomes. Using nine molecular markers, I screened the simulans X chromosome for genetic factors that were responsible for the differences between a pair of simulans lines with high (H) and low (L) missing bristle numbers. Together with duplication-rescue experiments, a single major quantitative locus was mapped to a 13F–14F region. Importantly, this region accounted for most of the differences between H and L lines in three other independent pairs, suggesting segregation of H and L alleles at the single locus in different populations. Moreover, a deficiency screening uncovered several regions with factors that potentially cause the hybrid bristle loss due to epistatic interactions with the other factors.


1989 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Santiago ◽  
A. Dom�nguez ◽  
J. Albornoz ◽  
R. Pi�eiro ◽  
J. I. Izquierdo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Gaspar ◽  
Saad Arif ◽  
Lauren Sumner-Rooney ◽  
Maike Kittelmann ◽  
Andrew J. Bodey ◽  
...  

AbstractThe compound eyes of insects exhibit striking variation in size, reflecting adaptation to different lifestyles and habitats. However, the genetic and developmental bases of variation in insect eye size is poorly understood, which limits our understanding of how these important morphological differences evolve. To address this, we further explored natural variation in eye size within and between four species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. We found extensive variation in eye size among these species, and flies with larger eyes generally had a shorter inter-ocular distance and vice versa. We then carried out quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping of intra-specific variation in eye size and inter-ocular distance in both D. melanogaster and D. simulans. This revealed that different genomic regions underlie variation in eye size and inter-ocular distance in both species, which we corroborated by introgression mapping in D. simulans. This suggests that although there is a trade-off between eye size and inter-ocular distance, variation in these two traits is likely to be caused by different genes and so can be genetically decoupled. Finally, although we detected QTL for intra-specific variation in eye size at similar positions in D. melanogaster and D. simulans, we observed differences in eye fate commitment between strains of these two species. This indicates that different developmental mechanisms and therefore, most likely, different genes contribute to eye size variation in these species. Taken together with the results of previous studies, our findings suggest that the gene regulatory network that specifies eye size has evolved at multiple genetic nodes to give rise to natural variation in this trait within and among species.


Chromosoma ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Golovnin ◽  
Sofia Georgieva ◽  
Hayk Hovhannisyan ◽  
Karine Barseguyan ◽  
Pavel Georgiev

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Burny ◽  
Viola Nolte ◽  
Marlies Dolezal ◽  
Christian Schl&oumltterer

Many adaptive traits are polygenic and frequently more loci contributing to the phenotype than needed are segregating in populations to express a phenotypic optimum. Experimental evolution provides a powerful approach to study polygenic adaptation using replicated populations adapting to a new controlled environment. Since genetic redundancy often results in non-parallel selection responses among replicates, we propose a modified Evolve and Resequencing (E&R) design that maximizes the similarity among replicates. Rather than starting from many founders, we only use two inbred Drosophila melanogaster strains and expose them to a very extreme, hot temperature environment (29°C). After 20 generations, we detect many genomic regions with a strong, highly parallel selection response in 10 evolved replicates. The X chromosome has a more pronounced selection response than the autosomes, which may be attributed to dominance effects. Furthermore, we find that the median selection coefficient for all chromosomes is higher in our two-genotype experiment than in classic E&R studies. Since two random genomes harbor sufficient variation for adaptive responses, we propose that this approach is particularly well-suited for the analysis of polygenic adaptation.


Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 1197-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K Kelly

The evolutionary processes governing variability within genomic regions of low recombination have been the focus of many studies. Here, I investigate the statistical properties of a measure of intrlocus genetic associations under the assumption that mutations are selectively neutral and sites are completely linked. This measure, denoted ZnS, is based on the squared correlation of allelic identity at pairs of polymorphic sites. Upper bounds for ZnS are determined by simulations. Various deviations from the neutral model, including several different forms of natural selection, will inflate the value of ZnS relative to its neutral theory expectations. Larger than expected values of ZnS are observed in genetic samples from the yellow-ac-scute and Adh regions of Drosophila melanogaster.


Genetics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 193 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack R. Bateman ◽  
Michael F. Palopoli ◽  
Sarah T. Dale ◽  
Jennifer E. Stauffer ◽  
Anita L. Shah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document