Exercise and infection - interaction, risks and benefits

Author(s):  
G. Friman ◽  
N.-G. Ilbäck
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Mensink ◽  
Scott R. Hinze ◽  
Mark R. Lewis ◽  
Kirk Weishaar

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared M. Bruce ◽  
David P. Jarmolowicz ◽  
Sharon Lynch ◽  
Joanie Thelen ◽  
Seung-Lark Lim ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
SHERRY BOSCHERT
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Arianne F. Conty

Though responses to the Anthropocene have largely come from the natural and social sciences, religious responses to the Anthropocene have also been gaining momentum and many scholars have been calling for a religious response to complement scientific responses to climate change. Yet because Genesis 1:28 does indeed tell human beings to ‘subdue the earth’ monotheistic religions have often been understood as complicit in the human exceptionalism that is thought to have created the conditions for the Anthropocene. In distinction to such Biblical traditions, indigenous animistic cultures have typically respected all forms of life as ‘persons’ and such traditions have thus become a source of inspiration for ecological movements. After discussing contemporary Christian efforts to integrate the natural sciences and the environment into their responses to the Anthropocene, this article will turn to animism and seek to evaluate the risks and benefits that could ensue from a postmodern form of animism that could provide a necessary postsecular response to the Anthropocene.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document