Positive ecosystem engineering effects of the antAtta vollenweiderion the shrubGrabowskia duplicata

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sosa ◽  
Alejandro Brazeiro
2014 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitriy Grazhdankin

When each of the Avalon-, Ediacara-, and Nama-type fossil assemblages are tracked through geological time, there appear to be changes in species composition and diversity, almost synchronized between different sedimentary environments, allowing a subdivision of the late Ediacaran into the Redkinian, Belomorian and Kotlinian geological time intervals. The Redkinian (580–559 Ma) is characterized by first appearance of both eumetazoan traces and macroscopic organisms (frondomorphs and vendobionts) in a form of Avalon-type communities in the inner shelf environment, whereas coeval Ediacara-type communities remained depauperate. The Belomorian (559–550 Ma) is marked by the advent of eumetazoan burrowing activity in the inner shelf, diversification of frondomorphs, migration of vendobionts from the inner shelf into higher energy environments, and appearance of tribrachiomorphs and bilateralomorphs. Ediacaran organisms formed distinctive ecological associations that coexisted in the low-energy inner shelf (Avalon-type communities), in the wave- and current-agitated shoreface (Ediacara-type communities), and in the high-energy distributary systems (Nama-type communities). The Kotlinian (550–540 Ma) witnessed an expansion of the burrowing activity into wave- and current-agitated shoreface, disappearance of vendobionts, tribrachiomorphs and bilateralomorphs in wave- and current-agitated shoreface, together with a drop in frondomorph diversity. High-energy distributary channel systems of prodeltas served as refugia for Nama-type communities that survived until the end of the Ediacaran and disappeared when the burrowing activity reached high-energy environments. This pattern is interpreted as an expression of ecosystem engineering by eumetazoans, with the Ediacaran organisms being progressively outcompeted by bilaterians.


1998 ◽  
Vol 265 (1401) ◽  
pp. 1091-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Thomas ◽  
F. Renaud ◽  
T. de Meeûs ◽  
R. Poulin

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Root-Bernstein ◽  
Andres Fierro ◽  
Juan Armesto ◽  
Luis A Ebensperger

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R Miller ◽  
Stuart N Lane

Matthews’ 1992 geoecological model of vegetation succession within glacial forefields describes how following deglaciation the landscape evolves over time as the result of both biotic and abiotic factors, with the importance of each depending on the level of environmental stress within the system. We focus in this paper on how new understandings of abiotic factors and the potential for biogeomorphic feedbacks between abiotic and biotic factors makes further development of this model important. Disturbance and water dynamics are two abiotic factors that have been shown to create stress gradients that can drive early ecosystem succession. The subsequent establishment of microbial communities and vegetation can then result in biogeomorphic feedbacks via ecosystem engineering that influence the role of disturbance and water dynamics within the system. Microbes can act as ecosystem engineers by supplying nutrients (via remineralization of organic matter and nitrogen fixation), enhancing soil development, either decreasing (encouraging weathering) or increasing (binding sediment grains) geomorphic stability, and helping retain soil moisture. Vegetation can act as an ecosystem engineer by fixing nitrogen, enhancing soil development, modifying microbial community structure, creating seed banks, and increasing geomorphic stability. The feedbacks between vegetation and water dynamics in glacial forefields are still poorly studied. We propose a synthesized model of ecosystem succession within glacial forefields that combines Matthews’ initial geoecological model and Corenblit's model to illustrate how gradients in environmental stress combined with successional time drive the balance between abiotic and biotic factors and ultimately determine the successional stage and potential for biogeomorphic feedbacks.


2018 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie S. Haussmann ◽  
Michelle A. Louw ◽  
Simone Lewis ◽  
Keegan J.H. Nicol ◽  
Stephni van der Merwe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thomas Wernberg ◽  
Francisco Arenas ◽  
Celia Olabarria ◽  
Mads Thomsen ◽  
Margaret Mohring

Mammalia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-289
Author(s):  
Steven G. Platt ◽  
David P. Bickford ◽  
Myo Min Win ◽  
Thomas R. Rainwater

Abstract Elephants are widely recognized as ecosystem engineers. To date, most research on ecosystem engineering by elephants has focused on Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis, and the role of Elephas maximus is much less well-known. We here report observations of anuran eggs and larva in water-filled tracks (n=20) of E. maximus in Myanmar. Our observations suggest that water-filled tracks persist for >1 year and function as small lentic waterbodies that provide temporary, predator-free breeding habitat for anurans during the dry season when alternate sites are unavailable. Trackways could also function as “stepping stones” that connect anuran populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document