PROCESS AND CONTENT PROBLEMS OF PRIMARY CARE PERSONNEL: THE HEALTH CARE TEAM

1978 ◽  
Vol 310 (1 Primary Healt) ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
George Blatti
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Pullon ◽  
Eileen McKinlay ◽  
Maria Stubbe ◽  
Lindsay Todd ◽  
Christopher Badenhorst

INTRODUCTION: Effective teamwork in primary care settings is integral to the ongoing health of those with chronic conditions. This study compares patient and health professional perceptions about teams, team membership, and team members’ roles. This study aimed to test both the feasibility of undertaking a collaborative method of enquiry as a means of investigating patient perceptions about teamwork in the context of their current health care, and also to compare and contrast these views with those of their usual health professionals in New Zealand suburban general practice settings. METHODS: Using a qualitative methodology, 10 in-depth interviews with eight informants at two practices were conducted and data analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The methodology successfully elicited confidential interviews with both patients and the health professionals providing their care. Perceptions of the perceived value of team care and qualities facilitating good teamwork were largely concordant. Patient and health professionals differed in their knowledge and understanding about team roles and current chronic care programmes, and had differing perceptions about health care team leadership. CONCLUSION: This study supports the consensus that team-based care is essential for those with chronic conditions, but suggests important differences between patient and health professional views as to who should be in a health care team and what their respective roles might be in primary care settings. These differences are worthy of further exploration, as a lack of common understanding has the potential to consistently undermine otherwise well-intentioned efforts to achieve best possible health for patients with chronic conditions. KEYWORDS: Primary health care; chronic disease; physicians; nurses; patients; patient care team


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Dawson-Rose ◽  
Yvette P. Cuca ◽  
Martha Shumway ◽  
Katy Davis ◽  
Edward L. Machtinger

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Tobin Tyler

Medical-legal partnership (MLP) is a health care delivery innovation that embeds civil legal aid expertise into the health care team to address health-harming legal needs for vulnerable populations at risk for poor health. The MLP approach focuses on prevention by addressing upstream structural and systemic social and legal problems that affect patient and population health. Because many unmet legal needs affect health (such as residing in substandard housing; wrongful denial of government income supports, health insurance, or food assistance; family violence; and barriers to care based on immigration status), lawyers are important members of the health care team. This review describes the MLP approach to addressing the social determinants of health, examines its benefits for improving the delivery of primary care for vulnerable patients and populations, and explores new opportunities for MLP in primary care with the advent of systems reforms driven by the Affordable Care Act.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 754-764
Author(s):  
Alden Yuanhong Lai ◽  
Christina T. Yuan ◽  
Jill A. Marsteller ◽  
Susan M. Hannum ◽  
Elyse C. Lasser ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (29) ◽  
pp. 1-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Peckham ◽  
Jane Falconer ◽  
Steve Gillam ◽  
Alison Hann ◽  
Sally Kendall ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis project examines the organisation and delivery of health improvement activities by and within general practice and the primary health-care team. The project was designed to examine who delivers these interventions, where they are located, what approaches are developed in practices, how individual practices and the primary health-care team organise such public health activities, and how these contribute to health improvement. Our focus was on health promotion and ill-health prevention activities.AimsThe aim of this scoping exercise was to identify the current extent of knowledge about the health improvement activities in general practice and the wider primary health-care team. The key objectives were to provide an overview of the range and type of health improvement activities, identify gaps in knowledge and areas for further empirical research. Our specific research objectives were to map the range and type of health improvement activity undertaken by general practice staff and the primary health-care team based within general practice; to scope the literature on health improvement in general practice or undertaken by health-care staff based in general practice and identify gaps in the evidence base; to synthesise the literature and identify effective approaches to the delivery and organisation of health improvement interventions in a general practice setting; and to identify the priority areas for research as defined by those working in general practice.MethodsWe undertook a comprehensive search of the literature. We followed a staged selection process involving reviews of titles and abstracts. This resulted in the identification of 1140 papers for data extraction, with 658 of these papers selected for inclusion in the review, of which 347 were included in the evidence synthesis. We also undertook 45 individual and two group interviews with primary health-care staff.FindingsMany of the research studies reviewed had some details about the type, process or location, or who provided the intervention. Generally, however, little attention is paid in the literature to examining the impact of the organisational context on the way services are delivered or how this affects the effectiveness of health improvement interventions in general practice. We found that the focus of attention is mainly on individual prevention approaches, with practices engaging in both primary and secondary prevention. The range of activities suggests that general practitioners do not take a population approach but focus on individual patients. However, it is clear that many general practitioners see health promotion as an integral part of practice, whether as individual approaches to primary or secondary health improvement or as a practice-based approach to improving the health of their patients. Our key conclusion is that there is currently insufficient good evidence to support many of the health improvement interventions undertaken in general practice and primary care more widely.Future ResearchFuture research on health improvement in general practice and by the primary health-care team needs to move beyond clinical research to include delivery systems and be conducted in a primary care setting. More research needs to examine areas where there are chronic disease burdens – cancer, dementia and other disabilities of old age. Reviews should be commissioned that examine the whole prevention pathway for health problems that are managed within primary care drawing together research from general practice, pharmacy, community engagement, etc.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0217738
Author(s):  
Clarice Magalhães Rodrigues Reis ◽  
Antônio Thomaz Gonzaga Matta-Machado ◽  
João Henrique Lara Amaral ◽  
Juliana Vaz de Melo Mambrini ◽  
Marcos Azeredo Furquim Werneck ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Odell Kirsty

Kirsty Odell, Senior Solicitor in the corporate health care team of law firm Hempsons points the way to develop your Primary Care Network


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document