The Relatedness to Others in Physical Activity Scale: Evidence for Structural and Criterion Validity

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M. Wilson ◽  
Enrique Garcia Bengoechea
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidde P. van der Ploeg ◽  
Kitty R.M. Streppel ◽  
Allard J. van der Beek ◽  
Luc H.V. van der Woude ◽  
Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten ◽  
...  

Background:The objective was to determine the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD).Methods:Forty-five non-wheelchair dependent subjects were recruited from three Dutch rehabilitation centers. Subjects’ diagnoses were: stroke, spinal cord injury, whiplash, and neurological-, orthopedic- or back disorders. The PASIPD is a 7-d recall physical activity questionnaire that was completed twice, 1 wk apart. During this week, physical activity was also measured with an Actigraph accelerometer.Results:The test-retest reliability Spearman correlation of the PASIPD was 0.77. The criterion validity Spearman correlation was 0.30 when compared to the accelerometer.Conclusions:The PASIPD had test-retest reliability and criterion validity that is comparable to well established self-report physical activity questionnaires from the general population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 726-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S.L. Pedersen ◽  
L.H. Mortensen ◽  
S. Brage ◽  
A.L. Bjerregaard ◽  
M. Aadahl

Background: The Physical Activity Scale (PAS2) was developed to measure physical activity (PA) during work, transportation and leisure time, in the Danish adult population. The objective of this study was to assess the criterion validity of PAS2 against a combined accelerometer and heart rate monitor in Danish adults and to investigate if the criterion validity differed by socio-demographic factors and body mass index. Method: A total of 330 Danish adults (mean age = 46.7 years, 38.5% men) participating in the Health2008 study completed the PAS2 questionnaire and wore a combined accelerometer and heart rate sensor for seven days. Average daily estimates from PAS2 were categorised into time spent in sedentary behaviour, light PA, moderate PA and vigorous PA and were compared to the objective measures. Results: PAS2 accounted for 19.5 hours/day on average. Time spent in sedentary behaviour, light and moderate-intensity PA was weakly correlated with objective data (polychoric correlation coefficients (PCC): 0.18–0.20), whereas vigorous intensity PA was moderately correlated (PCC: 0.54, p = 0.04). Mean bias was −2.3 hours/day (95% limits of agreement (LoA): −9.04 to 4.34) for sedentary behaviour, 1.68 hours/day (LoA: 8.02 to −4.62) for light activity, 0.55 hours/day (LoA: 3.37 to −2.26) for moderate activity and 0.12 hours/day (LoA: 0.57 to 0.33) for vigorous activity. Criterion validity was lower in women, in participants who were above 40 years, overweight, had short education and were unemployed. Conclusions: PAS2 overestimated time spent on light, moderate and vigorous intensity PA and underestimated time spent on sedentary behaviour. Validity differed by key socio-demographic characteristics.


1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Washburn ◽  
Kevin W. Smith ◽  
Alan M. Jette ◽  
Carol A. Janney

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 101949
Author(s):  
Ana M. Valles-Medina ◽  
Sergio I. Castillo-Anaya ◽  
Thelma L. Sevilla-Mena ◽  
Mette Aadahl

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S363
Author(s):  
S. F. Figoni ◽  
R. A. Washburn ◽  
C. H. Thompson ◽  
G. W. White

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Krahnstoever Davison ◽  
Dorothy L. Schmalz ◽  
Danielle Symons Downs

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Olaya-Contreras ◽  
Myriam Bastidas ◽  
Daniel Arvidsson

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Hagiwara ◽  
Naomi Ito ◽  
Kazuhiko Sawai ◽  
Keiko Kazuma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document