scholarly journals Effects of dispersal strategy and migration history on genetic diversity and population structure of Antarctic lichens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Lagostina ◽  
Mikhail Andreev ◽  
Francesco Dal Grande ◽  
Felix Grewe ◽  
Aline Lorenz ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramiro Morales-Hojas ◽  
Jingxuan Sun ◽  
Fernando Alvira Iraizoz ◽  
Xiaoling Tan ◽  
Julian Chen

AbstractGenetic diversity of populations has important ecological and evolutionary consequences, which are fundamental to improve the sustainability of agricultural production. Studies of how differences in agricultural management and environment influence the population structure of insect pests are fundamental to predict outbreaks and optimise control programmes. Here, we have studied the population genetic diversity and evolution of Sitobion avenae and Sitobion miscanthi (previously mistaken for S. avenae), which are among the most relevant aphid pests of cereals across Europe and China, respectively. We have used a genomic approach that allows the identification of weak geographic structure and migration patterns at scales that were previously not discernible. In the present study, we show that the population structure in present day populations are different from that described in previous studies, which suggests that they have evolved recently possibly as a response to human-induced changes in agriculture. In the UK, S. avenae is predominantly anholocyclic and, as a result of the evolution of insecticide resistance, a superclone is now dominant across the geographic distribution in the country and the genetic diversity is low. In China, S. miscanthi populations are mostly holocyclic, with one sexual stage in autumn to produce overwintering eggs, and there are six genetically differentiated subpopulations and high genetic differentiation between geographic locations, which suggests that further taxonomical research is needed. Unlike in the case of S. avenae in England, there is no evidence for insecticide resistance and there is no predominance of a single lineage in S. miscanthi in China.


Plant Disease ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 666-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Gagnon ◽  
Nicolas Feau ◽  
Angela L. Dale ◽  
Braham Dhillon ◽  
Richard C. Hamelin ◽  
...  

Phytophthora ramorum is the causal agent of sudden oak death and sudden larch death, and is also responsible for causing ramorum blight on woody ornamental plants. Many microsatellite markers are available to characterize the genetic diversity and population structure of P. ramorum. However, only two markers are polymorphic in the NA2 lineage, which is predominant in Canadian nurseries. Microsatellite motifs were mined from whole-genome sequence data of six P. ramorum NA2 isolates. Of the 43 microsatellite primer pairs selected, 13 loci displayed different allele sizes among the four P. ramorum lineages, 10 loci displayed intralineage variation in the EU1, EU2, and/or NA1 lineages, and 12 microsatellites displayed polymorphism in the NA2 lineage. Genotyping of 272 P. ramorum NA2 isolates collected in nurseries in British Columbia, Canada, from 2004 to 2013 revealed 12 multilocus genotypes (MLGs). One MLG was dominant when examined over time and across sampling locations, and only a few mutations separated the 12 MLGs. The NA2 population observed in Canadian nurseries also showed no signs of sexual recombination, similar to what has been observed in previous studies. The markers developed in this study can be used to assess P. ramorum inter- and intralineage genetic diversity and generate a better understanding of the population structure and migration patterns of this important plant pathogen, especially for the lesser-characterized NA2 lineage.


2012 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore G. Schurr ◽  
Matthew C. Dulik ◽  
Amanda C. Owings ◽  
Sergey I. Zhadanov ◽  
Jill B. Gaieski ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anpei Zhou ◽  
Dan Zong ◽  
Peihua Gan ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-731
Author(s):  
Xu Gangbiao ◽  
Liang Yan ◽  
Jiang Yan ◽  
Liu Xiongsheng ◽  
Hu Shangli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 744-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Ting QIAO ◽  
Chun-Lei MA ◽  
Yan-Hua ZHOU ◽  
Ming-Zhe YAO ◽  
Rao LIU ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2286-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Di YUE ◽  
Li-Bin WEI ◽  
Ti-De ZHANG ◽  
Chun LI ◽  
Hong-Mei MIAO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document