An evaluation of reproducibility and transparency indicators in orthopedic literature

Author(s):  
Ian Fladie ◽  
Sheridan Evans ◽  
Jake Checketts ◽  
Daniel Tritz ◽  
Brent Norris ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Milankov ◽  
Miodrag Vranjes ◽  
Zlatko Budinski ◽  
Mile Bjelobrk

Bilateral simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament ruptures are very rare and only a few cases have been previously reported in the orthopedic literature. We present a case of simultaneous bilateral ACL tears in an actor who sustained injuries after landing from a guitar jump during a theatre performance. The patient underwent a two-stage bilateral ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Tepeneu NF

The three most common elbow fractures classically reported in pediatric orthopedic literature are supracondylar (50–70%), lateral condylar (17–34%), and medial epicondylar fractures (10%). The mechanism of injury varies, but the most commonly described mechanism involves a fall on an outstretched hand with varus, valgus or rotational force or a combination thereof. The vectors of force and the degree of chondro-osseous development dictate the type of injury incurred. A review of the literature was conducted to see the most frequent injuries and complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Chidambaram ◽  
Reet Mukhopadhyay

Rotator cuff pathology is one of the most common conditions affecting the shoulder joint. Several classification systems have been used to describe rotator cuff tears in orthopedic literature. However, no comprehensive classification inclusive of all types and characteristics currently exists. Rotator cuff tears are classified based on various parameters. These include: 1. Tear depth 2. Tear Size/Extent 3. Tear Retraction 4. Tendon Quality 5. Tear Progression 6. Arthroscopic Classification. This review article aims to establish an algorithm based on the various existing classification systems so as to arrive at the best surgical or non-surgical solution as well as prognosticate the patient regarding the outcome. Special consideration needs to be made for massive tears which are irreparable. Keywords: Rotator cuff tears; Rotator cuff tear classification; Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears; Partial rotator cuff tears; Subscapularis tears; Geometric Classification; Arthroscopic Classification; Rotator cuff retraction; Rotator cuff tendon quality; Prognosis for Rotator Cuff tears.


Orthopedics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. e1225-e1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoyang Hui ◽  
Zhongmei Yi ◽  
Jun Peng

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 145-160
Author(s):  
Emma R Berube ◽  
Cesar D Lopez ◽  
David P Trofa ◽  
Charles A Popkin

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Palepu ◽  
M. Kodigudla ◽  
V. K. Goel

Disc degeneration and associated disorders are among the most debated topics in the orthopedic literature over the past few decades. These may be attributed to interrelated mechanical, biochemical, and environmental factors. The treatment options vary from conservative approaches to surgery, depending on the severity of degeneration and response to conservative therapies. Spinal fusion is considered to be the “gold standard” in surgical methods till date. However, the association of adjacent level degeneration has led to the evolution of motion preservation technologies like spinal arthroplasty and posterior dynamic stabilization systems. These new technologies are aimed to address pain and preserve motion while maintaining a proper load sharing among various spinal elements. This paper provides an elaborative biomechanical review of the technologies aimed to address the disc degeneration and reiterates the point that biomechanical efficacy followed by long-term clinical success will allow these nonfusion technologies as alternatives to fusion, at least in certain patient population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
pp. 366-371
Author(s):  
Drake G. LeBrun ◽  
Jen Bido ◽  
Mininder S. Kocher ◽  
Keith D. Baldwin ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hwa Eom ◽  
Ankur B. Bamne ◽  
Madhav Chowdhry ◽  
Ihn Seok Chae ◽  
Tae Kyun Kim

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 943-953
Author(s):  
Michael C. Bond ◽  
Daniel L. Lemkin ◽  
William Brady

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document