scholarly journals CEO EXTRAVERSION AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS: THE ROLE OF FIRM DYNAMICS, PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION, AND FINANCIAL CRISIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 847-893
Author(s):  
Theophilus Lartey ◽  
Kwabena Kesse ◽  
Albert Danso
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Firm Dynamics ◽  
Product Market Competition

Capital structure, competitive intensity and firm performance: evidence from Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 796-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveed Ahmed ◽  
Talat Afza
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Debt Financing ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Competitive Intensity ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Moderating Role

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the moderating role of competitive intensity between the existing relationship of capital structure and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach Using the balanced panel data of listed non-financial firms of Pakistan, the present study adopts both the panel and OLS estimation techniques to draw the inferences. Findings The results exhibit that high debt ratio is harmful for the accounting performance of the selected sample firms of Pakistan. In addition, product market competition negatively moderates the relationship between capital structure and firm performance which suggests that high product market competition can be used as a substitute of debt financing to align the interests of a firm’s managers and shareholders. Practical implications The findings of the research provide evidence for the policy makers/regulators that the sample firms should discourage the high debt financing in the presence of competitive intensity in the product marketplace. Originality/value The core contribution of the current research is to examine the moderating role of product market competition on the leverage–performance relationship because, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no single study has previously explored this relationship in the context of Pakistan.

Agency problems and the value of advertising expenditures in an emerging market: role of product market competition

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1123-1143
Author(s):  
Omar Farooq ◽  
Zakir Pashayev
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Agency Problems ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThis paper documents the impact of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditures.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use the data for non-financial firms from India and the pooled regression procedure to test their arguments during the period between 2009 and 2018.FindingsThe results show that advertising expenditures of firms operating in sectors with relatively high competition are more valuable than advertising expenditures of firms operating in sectors with relatively low competition. The results of the study are robust across various proxies of advertising expenditures and firm performance. Furthermore, the results also show that the positive impact of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditures is confined only to firms that already have lower agency problems.Originality/valueThe results of the study highlight the importance of product market competition on the value of advertising expenditure in the emerging market setting, where agency problems are supposed to be high.

Product market competition, cash flow and corporate investments

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Ali Ahmad Abdoh ◽  
Oscar Varela
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Growth Firms ◽  
Capital Spending ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of product market competition on capital spending (investments) financed by cash flow (CF), and the role of financial constraints (FC) on these effects. Design/methodology/approach The Herfindahl-Hirschman index of concentration measures competition. Earnings retention, working capital, the Kaplan and Zingales (1997) index and CF shortfalls measure FC. Regressions relating capital spending to competition are performed for the full sample, as well as financially constrained and unconstrained, and growth and value firms’ sub-samples. For robustness, large reductions in import tariffs are examined to exogenously measure competition, with the impact of these on capital spending tested via the difference-in-difference method. Findings The results show that competition fosters valuable investments when firms are financially unconstrained, especially for growth firms, and reduces these investments when they are financially constrained, especially for value firms. Practical implications The role of policy makers in alleviating FC should be focused toward growth firms that operate in competitive industries. As well, increasing financial pressure on value firms in competitive industries can have desirable effects, as it forces these firms to reduce investment inefficiency. Originality/value Many firm-specific and environmental factors drive the relation between competition and investment. Khanna and Tice (2000) find profitable firms increasing and highly levered firms decreasing investments in response to Wal-Mart’s entry into their markets. Jiang et al. (2015) suggest that environments with predictable growth drive a positive relation between competition and investments. This study claims that another factor that affects this relation is the firm’s level of FC.

Modeling product market competition and reporting quality: the transitional economy of China

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad Iqbal ◽  
Zia-ur-Rehman Rao ◽  
Muhammad Zubair Tauni ◽  
Khalil Jebran
Keyword(s):  
Market Competition ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Transitional Economy ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Absolute Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Absolute

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of product market competition in shaping a firm’s reporting quality (RQ). Design/methodology/approach This research uses an aggregate measure of a firm’s RQ, considering both the absolute level of discretionary accruals (DA) and the quality of accruals, using modified Jones model and Francis et al. (2005) accruals quality model, respectively. Whereas, the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and the Lerner index are used to measure product market competition. Further, this study considers the transitional economy of China and employs panel data estimation techniques for testing the hypothesized relationships. Findings This study finds that firms operating in more competitive industries are associated with higher RQ. This association still prevails when analysis is done using the component measures of RQ (i.e. the absolute level of DA and the quality of accruals). Overall, the empirical results provide evidence on the disciplining role of product market competition among Chinese firms. Practical implications Given the complex governance structures and specific kind of agency problems in Chinese corporations, this study suggests that product market competition may play an external disciplining role to improve the corporate information environment. Originality/value This research explores the role of product market competition for a firm’s RQ in Chinese-listed companies, while the prior studies on the same topic are mostly from the developed countries.

Financial Strength and Product Market Competition: Evidence from Asbestos Litigation

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Hadlock ◽  
Ramana Sonti
Keyword(s):  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
General Hypothesis ◽  
Market Interactions ◽  
Exogenous Shocks ◽  
Financial Strength ◽  
Liability Structure

AbstractWe study the role of financial strength on product market competition by examining exogenous shocks to a firm’s liability structure arising from asbestos litigation. We find that exogenous increases (decreases) in asbestos liabilities are interpreted by the market as negative (positive) news for a firm’s close competitors. These reactions are magnified in events in which one asbestos-tainted firm goes bankrupt and other asbestos-tainted stocks fall on the news of the bankruptcy. For smaller competitors, market reactions are more pronounced in more concentrated industries. Our findings support the general hypothesis that increases in fixed liabilities lead to more aggressive product market interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document