Clinicopathological study on para-aortic lymph node metastasis without pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1733-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoko Tomisato ◽  
Wataru Yamagami ◽  
Nobuyuki Susumu ◽  
Michiko Kuwahata ◽  
Aya Takigawa ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Chi ◽  
R. R. Barakat ◽  
M. J. Palayekar ◽  
D. A. Levine ◽  
Y. Sonoda ◽  
...  

The seminal Gynecologic Oncology Group study on surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer demonstrated the risk of pelvic lymph node metastasis for clinical stage I endometrial cancer based on tumor grade and thirds of myometrial invasion. However, the FIGO staging system assigns surgical stage by categorizing depth of myometrial invasion in halves. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer based on tumor grade and myometrial invasion as per the current FIGO staging system. We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent primary surgical staging for clinical stage I endometrial cancer at our institution between May 1993 and November 2005. To make the study cohort as homogeneous as possible, we included only cases of endometrioid histology. We also included only patients who had adequate staging, which was defined as a total hysterectomy with removal of at least eight pelvic lymph nodes. During the study period, 1036 patients underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer. The study cohort was composed of the 349 patients who met study inclusion criteria. Distribution of tumor grade was as follows: grade 1, 80 (23%); grade 2, 182 (52%); and grade 3, 87 (25%). Overall, 30 patients (9%) had pelvic lymph node metastasis. The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in relation to tumor grade and depth of myometrial invasion (none, inner half, and outer half) was as follows: grade 1–0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively; grade 2–4%, 10%, and 17%, respectively; and grade 3–0%, 7%, and 28%, respectively. We determined the incidence of pelvic nodal metastasis in a large cohort of endometrial cancer patients of uniform histologic subtype in relation to tumor grade and a one-half myometrial invasion cutoff. These data are more applicable to current surgical practice than the previously described one-third myometrial invasion cutoff results.


1996 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
N TAKESHIMA ◽  
Y HIRAI ◽  
N TANAKA ◽  
T YAMAWAKI ◽  
K YAMAUCHI ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 300 (4) ◽  
pp. 1007-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujie Li ◽  
Peishan Cong ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Chong Peng ◽  
Mingjun Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Chen ◽  
Hui Duan ◽  
Wenling Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Current opinions on whether surgical patients with cervical cancer should undergo para-aortic lymphadenectomy at the same time are inconsistent. The present study examined differences in survival outcomes with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.Methods: We retrospectively compared the survival outcomes of 8802 cervical cancer patients with stage IB1-IIA2 (FIGO 2009) from 37 hospitals in mainland China, who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=8445) or abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy + para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=357).Results: Among the 8802 patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer, 1618 (18.38%) patients had postoperative pelvic lymph node metastasis, and 37 (10.36%) patients had para-aortic lymph node metastasis. When pelvic lymph node metastasized, the para-aortic lymph node simultaneous metastasis rate was 30.00% (36/120). The risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis was 0.42% (1/237). There were no significant differences in the survival outcomes between the para-aortic lymph node unresected and resected groups. No differences in the survival outcomes were found before or after matching between the two groups regardless of pelvic lymph node negativity/positivity. Conclusion: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve 5-year survival outcomes in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Therefore, when pelvic lymph node metastasis is negative, the risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis is very low, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. When pelvic lymph node metastasis is positive, para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be carefully selected because of the high risk of this procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document