scholarly journals Modified Activation Technique for Nasal Stent of Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance for Columellar Lengthening in Bilateral Cleft Lip/Palate

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pravinkumar G. Patil ◽  
Smita P. Nimbalkar-Patil
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Hoshal ◽  
Roberto N. Solis ◽  
Travis T. Tollefson

AbstractRhinoplasty for cleft lip nasal deformities challenges all cleft surgeons. There is great variability of phenotypical anatomy, but iatrogenic changes and scarring from the previous surgeries add another layer of complexity. Rhinoplasties on a patient with cleft lip–palate are technically and intellectually challenging to master requiring a patient-tailored approach. The shape and structure of the nose are changed to improve both function and aesthetic appearance. In the primary setting, nasoalveolar molding is a form of presurgical infant orthopaedics used for preparation before the cleft lip and nose repair. Intermediate stages should be conservative to minimize scarring, while the definitive cleft rhinoplasty utilizes cartilage grafts from septum, ear, or rib to sculpt the nose. Hereinto, we will outline the controversies, the evidence supporting certain techniques, and our preferences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. e179-e184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belma Isik Aslan ◽  
Ayşe Gülşen ◽  
Kemal Findikçioğlu ◽  
Deniz Uzuner ◽  
Neslihan Üçüncü

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Liang ◽  
Jinfeng Yao ◽  
Philip K.T. Chen ◽  
Cangshang Zheng ◽  
Jiying Yang

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) on long-term nasal symmetry and shaping after primary cheiloplasty in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate (UCL/P). Design: This was a two-group, parallel, retrospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting: The setting for this study was the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Patients: Patients were divided into one of the following two groups: infants with UCL/P who underwent PNAM (PNAM group, n = 42) and infants with UCL/P who did not undergo PNAM (non-PNAM group, n = 42). Interventions: Interventions included PNAM and primary cheiloplasty without nasal cartilage dissection. Main Outcome Measures: In this study, 4- to 5-year postoperative full-face and submental oblique photographs were taken of all patients and scored from 1 to 5 points by 10 medical evaluators. The scores were statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, and P < .05 was considered to represent statistical significance. Results: After 1 to 3 months of PNAM but before primary cheiloplasty, the displaced nasal and alveolar cartilage showed obvious improvement. However, the scores in the PNAM and non-PNAM groups at 4 to 5 years postoperatively were 66.62 ± 14.25 and 66.31 ± 15.08, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( F = 0.009, P = .923). Conclusion: PNAM as an early-stage adjunctive therapy for nasal deformity correction is beneficial before primary cheiloplasty, but it is insufficient to maintain long-term nostril symmetry after primary cheiloplasty without nasal cartilage dissection.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L. Spengler ◽  
Carmen Chavarria ◽  
John F. Teichgraeber ◽  
Jaime Gateno ◽  
James J. Xia

Objective To evaluate the outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy in the treatment of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Design A prospective study with blinded measurements. Setting The Cleft and Craniofacial Clinic at the University of Texas at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas. Patients Eight patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate, treated between 2002 and 2004. Interventions The starting age for presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy was 34.9 days and the average length of the therapy was 212.5 days. Main Outcome Measures Measurements of intraoral and extraoral casts were performed, and statistical analyses were used to compare the differences between measurements before and after therapy. Results Intraoral measurements demonstrated that there was a statistically significant reduction of the premaxillary protrusion and deviation. There was also a significant reduction in the width of the larger cleft. Extraoral measurements revealed that there was a significant increase in the bi-alar width and in the columellar length and width. Moreover, there was a significant improvement in columellar deviation. Finally, the nostril heights of both sides were increased. Conclusion The authors have quantitatively shown that presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy has significant advantages in the treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. It improves the nasal asymmetry and deficient nasal tip projection associated with bilateral cleft lip and palate. It also forces the protruded premaxillary segment into alignment with the dental alveolar segments, improving the shape of the maxillary arch. As a result, the changes associated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy help decrease the complexity of subsequent surgeries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document