scholarly journals A meta‐analysis of microRNA networks regulated by melatonin in cancer: Portrait of potential candidates for breast cancer treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Gustavo de Almeida Chuffa ◽  
Robson Francisco Carvalho ◽  
Luis Antônio Justulin ◽  
Sarah Santiloni Cury ◽  
Fábio Rodrigues Ferreira Seiva ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 720-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
MUYOU TIAN ◽  
YAHUA ZHONG ◽  
FUXIANG ZHOU ◽  
CONGHUA XIE ◽  
YUNFENG ZHOU ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 965-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J.G. Abrahams ◽  
M.F.M. Gielissen ◽  
I.C. Schmits ◽  
C.A.H.H.V.M. Verhagen ◽  
M.M. Rovers ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra Yadav ◽  
Pradeep Kumar ◽  
Vandana Rai

AbstractWorldwide breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death in women. Paclitaxel is an effective drug used for the treatment of breast cancer but it has many side effects. Nab-paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) is an FDA approved drug for the treatment of breast cancer. Currently many clinical trials are conducted to deliver nab-paclitaxel into the tumor cells. But the efficacy and safety of this nab-paclitaxel over conventional paclitaxel still remains questionable. So, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in breast cancer treatment.Electronic databases were searched for the suitable studies using key terms “nab-paclitaxel”, “paclitaxel”, and “clinical trial” with the combination of “breast cancer” up to August 11, 2019. Risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed by the Open Meta-Analyst program. A total of eight studies which fulfilled our criteria were included in this study. For efficacy we retrieved data of 12 months progression free survival, 24 months progression free survival, and overall survival (up to 3 years) and for the safety we took data of nausea, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea and pain.We did not found any difference in efficacy of nab-paclitaxel over paclitaxel (12 months progression free survival-RRFE= 0.86, 95%CI= 0.77-0.97, p= 0.02, I2= 25.07%; 24 months progression free survival-RRFE= 0.86, 95% CI= 0.64-1.16, p= 0.34, I2= 0%; and 3 years survival-RRFE= 1.20, 95%CI= 0.92-1.56, p= 0.16, I2= 37.55%). The meta-analysis of studies used nab-paclitaxel showed reduced adverse effect of anemia (ORFE= 1.66, 95% CI= 1.26-2.19; p= <0.001; I2= 0%) and leukopenia (ORFE= 1.37; 95%CI= 1.06-1.75; p= 0.01; I2= 48.63%). However, in case of other adverse effects no significant association was found with nab-paclitaxel (nausea-ORFE=1.15, 95%CI= 0.94-1.41, p= 0.15, I2= 50.12%; neutropenia-ORRE= 0.75, 95%CI= 0.30-1.87, p= 0.54, I2= 94.45%; fatigue-ORRE= 1.11, 95%CI= 0.77-1.62, p= 0.55, I2= 56.02; diarrhea-ORFE= 1.11, 95%CI= 0.77-1.62, p= 0.55; I2= 34.26; pain-ORRE= 1.15, 95%CI= 0.78-1.69, p= 0.45, I2= 52.96%).In conclusion the use of nab-paclitaxel has reduces the side effects of anemia and leukopenia in breast cancer treatment in comparison to paclitaxel but nab-paclitaxel has no effect on the overall survival of the patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol Vol 3 (No 2) ◽  
pp. 178-192
Author(s):  
Astère Manirakiza ◽  
Laurent Irakoze ◽  
Lin Shui ◽  
Sébastien Manirakiza ◽  
Louis Ngendahayo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document