scholarly journals Dyadic Representation in a Westminster System

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Hanretty ◽  
Benjamin E. Lauderdale ◽  
Nick Vivyan
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

A dyadic representation of belief

1992 ◽  
pp. 89-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Ove Hansson
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

Why Presentational Styles Matter for Dyadic Representation

2013 ◽  
pp. 120-140
Author(s):  
Justin Grimmer
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

District Voter Turnout and Dyadic Representation in Congress

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Flavin ◽  
Julie Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Voter Turnout ◽  
Dyadic Representation

scholarly journals Dyadic Representation in a Westminster System

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Hanretty ◽  
Benjamin E. Lauderdale ◽  
Nick Vivyan
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

Dyadic Representation and Boundedness of Nonhomogeneous Calderón–Zygmund Operators with Mild Kernel Regularity

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Grau de la Herrán ◽  
Tuomas Hytönen
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress

2012 ◽  
pp. 88-98
Author(s):  
Robert Weissberg
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Representation

scholarly journals Constituency Influence in Parliament

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Soroka ◽  
Erin Penner ◽  
Kelly Blidook
Keyword(s):  
Political Representation ◽  
Dyadic Relationship ◽  
Party Discipline ◽  
Electoral Connection ◽  
The Us ◽  
Parliamentary Systems ◽  
Dyadic Representation ◽  
Services Sociaux ◽  
Représentation Politique ◽  
The Comparative Study

Abstract. “Dyadic representation” has received considerable attention in the US, but much less attention in parliamentary systems where party discipline strongly limits representatives' capacity for individual action. A link between the legislative behaviour of representatives and the preferences of their geographic constituencies may nevertheless exist outside the US, however, particularly in single member plurality systems where the “electoral connection” is strong. This paper tests for evidence of this dyadic relationship in Question Period in the Canadian Parliament, across three policy domains: defense, debt and taxes, and welfare. As anticipated, there is evidence of dyadic representation in Canada. Results are discussed as they pertain to the comparative study of legislative institutions and political representation.Résumé. La «représentation dyadique» a reçu une attention considérable aux États-Unis, mais elle est beaucoup moins étudiée au sein des démocraties parlementaires où la discipline de parti limite fortement la marge de manœuvre des élus. Malgré tout, le lien entre le comportement politique des élus et les préférences de leurs commettants demeure important ailleurs qu'aux États-Unis, mais particulièrement dans les systèmes électoraux pluralitaires où la «connexion électorale» est forte. Cet article s'intéresse à cette représentation dyadique dans le cadre de la période des questions au Parlement canadien et plus particulièrement pour les trois enjeux suivants : la défense nationale, la politique fiscale et les services sociaux. Tel qu'attendu, la représentation dyadique semble se confirmer au Canada. Les résultats des analyses statistiques sont discutés et apportent un éclairage original sur l'étude comparée des institutions législatives et de la représentation politique.

scholarly journals On a Conjecture Concerning Dyadic Oriented Matroids

10.37236/1455 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Scobee
Keyword(s):  
Oriented Matroids ◽  
Oriented Matroid ◽  
Rational Matrix ◽  
Dyadic Representation ◽  
The Relationship

A rational matrix is totally dyadic if all of its nonzero subdeterminants are in $\{\pm 2^k\ :\ k \in {\bf Z}\}$. An oriented matriod is dyadic if it has a totally dyadic representation $A$. A dyadic oriented matriod is dyadic of order $k$ if it has a totally dyadic representation $A$ with full row rank and with the property that for each pair of adjacent bases $A_1$ and $A_2$ $$2^{-k} \le \left| { {\det(A_1)} \over {\det(A_2)}}\right|\le 2^k.$$ In this note we present a counterexample to a conjecture on the relationship between the order of a dyadic oriented matroid and the ratio of agreement to disagreement in sign of its signed circuits and cocircuits (Conjecture 5.2, Lee (1990)).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document