How can we optimise antifungal use in a solid organ transplant centre? Local epidemiology and antifungal stewardship implementation: A single‐centre study

Mycoses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 746-754
Author(s):  
Alessandra Mularoni ◽  
Lucia Adamoli ◽  
Piera Polidori ◽  
Barbara Ragonese ◽  
Santi Mauro Gioè ◽  
...  
Oral Oncology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Öhman ◽  
Helena Rexius ◽  
Lars Mjörnstedt ◽  
Helena Gonzalez ◽  
Erik Holmberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Marina Machado ◽  
Esther Chamorro de Vega ◽  
María del Carmen Martínez-Jiménez ◽  
Carmen Guadalupe Rodríguez-González ◽  
Antonio Vena ◽  
...  

The implementation of 1,3 β-d-glucan (BDG) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in antifungal stewardship programs (ASPs). We aimed to analyze the influence of serum BDG in an ASP for oncologic patients and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We conducted a pre–post study. In the initial period (PRE), the ASP was based on bedside advice, and this was complemented with BDG in the post-period (POST). Performance parameters of the BDG assay were determined. Antifungal (AF) use adequacy was evaluated using a point score. Clinical outcomes and AF costs were also compared before and after the intervention. Overall, 85 patients were included in the PRE-period and 112 in the POST-period. Probable or proven fungal infections were similar in both groups (54.1% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.67). The determination of BDG contributed to improved management in 75 of 112 patients (66.9%). The AF adequacy score improved in the POST-period (mean 7.75 vs. 9.29; p < 0.001). Median days of empiric AF treatment was reduced in the POST-period (9 vs. 5 days, p = 0.04). All-cause mortality (44.7% vs. 34.8%; p = 0.16) was similar in both periods. The cost of AF treatments was reduced in the POST-period with a difference of 779.6 €/patient. Our data suggest that the use of BDG was a cost-effective strategy that contributed to safely improving the results of an ASP for SOT and oncologic patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S672-S673
Author(s):  
Elisavet Chorafa ◽  
Elias Iosifidis ◽  
Andrea Oletto ◽  
Adilia Warris ◽  
Elio Castagnola ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While antifungal consumption in immunocompromised patients appears high, data on children are limited. We analyzed antifungal use in hospitalized immunocompromised children across Europe in order to better organize a European pediatric antifungal stewardship programs (pAFS). Methods A multicenter 12-wk modified point-prevalence study was conducted. All patients hospitalized in hematology-oncology (HO) or bone marrow/solid organ transplant (BMT/SOT) units across Europe and receiving systemic antifungals were included. Data on ward demographics and policies were collected once at the beginning; weekly ward and patient data were prospectively collected during the 12-wk study period and entered in REDCap. Systemic antifungals administered were recorded (doses, duration, reason for administration or discontinuation). Results Twenty-one HO and 10 BMT/SOT units from 18 hospitals in 11 European countries participated in the study and 572 antifungal prescriptions were recorded. The most common underlying conditions were: 69% malignancy (81% hematologic, 19% solid tumors), 20% BMT, 6% hematologic diseases except malignancy and 4% primary immunodeficiency. Indication of antifungals was prophylaxis for 439 (77%) and treatment for 133 (23%) prescriptions (62 empirical, 43 pre-emptive, 28 targeted). Most common reasons for empirical, pre-emptive and targeted treatment were antibiotic-resistant febrile neutropenia (52%), abnormalities on chest-CT with/without positive galactomannan (72%) and candidiasis (82%), respectively. For targeted treatment, the most frequent pathogens were C. albicans (50%), C. parapsilosis (11%) and A. fumigatus (11%). Overall, fluconazole and liposomal amphotericin B were the most frequently prescribed agents both for prophylaxis (31% and 21%) and treatment (32% and 23%). However, in BMT patients the most frequently prescribed antifungal agents were fluconazole or micafungin for prophylaxis and caspofungin and voriconazole for treatment (Table). Antifungal agents used per underlying condition Antifungal agents used per underlying condition Conclusion Most systemic antifungal prescribing across European HO and BMT/SOT units is for prophylaxis, and fluconazole is the main antifungal prescribed. Results from this multicenter study can be a first step to guide a Europe-wide pAFS. Disclosures Emmanuel Roilides, MD, PhD, ECMM (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, ECMM grant for this study)


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Gasteiger Lukas ◽  
Gabriel Putzer ◽  
Unterpertinger Regina ◽  
Cardini Benno ◽  
Schneeberger Stefan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document