Engaging consumers and health professionals in collaborative decision making to optimise care

Author(s):  
Chiung‐Jung (Jo) Wu ◽  
Megan Giles ◽  
Morne Terblanche ◽  
Anne Drabble
Author(s):  
James C. Raines ◽  
Nic T. Dibble

Identifying courses of action warns mental health professionals not to be caught in false dilemmas where only polar options are available. This chapter suggests using the “rule of three” to ensure that least three courses of action are ascertained. Next, it recommends considering the consequences of each possible course of action. To evaluate each of the alternatives, professionals should consider the moral values involved and responsibilities to multiple stakeholders. Based on the moral development of the students involved, professionals should involve them in collaborative decision-making and treat students as partners in the ethical process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Shangwen Yang ◽  
Jingting Zhang ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Yongjie Yan

To allocate the en-routes and slots resource to the flights with collaborative decision-making, a multiobjective 0-1 integer programming model was proposed. According to different demands from air traffic control departments, airlines, and passengers, efficiency, equity, and effectiveness principles of collaborative decision-making were considered. With the aim to minimize the total flight delay costs, the total number of turning points, and average delay time of passengers, the effectiveness constraints were achieved. The algorithm was designed to solve the model on the basis of the objective method, and Lingo11 and MatlabR2007b were applied in numerical tests. To test how well the model works in real world, a numerical test was performed based on the simulated data of a civil en-route. Test results show that, compared with the traditional strategy of first come first served, the model gains better effect. The superiority of the model was verified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document