Maxillofacial injuries due to animal attacks ‐ A case series

Oral Surgery ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manjunath Vijapur ◽  
Bhargav Ram ◽  
Mahabaleshwara Chalathadka ◽  
Anuradha Naganagoudar ◽  
Somshekhar Ulasandra ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1541-1545
Author(s):  
Suneel Kumar Punjabi ◽  
Altaf Ahmed Talpur ◽  
Abdul Rauf Memon ◽  
Miss` Priya

Background: The incidence of maxillofacial fractures is greater in Pakistan.This research has the crucial aim of achieve and indexing maxillofacial injuries in poly traumapatients. Objectives: To assess the concomitant injuries with maxillofacial trauma. StudyDesign: Descriptive case series. Setting: The department of Emergency and Oral & MaxillofacialSurgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. Period: Jan 2014 to Dec2015. Methods: Total 489 patients of both genders, aged ≥20 years were included. Results:more injuries 359 (73.40%) occurs among the age of 20-39 years. The mainly documentedetiologic factor for injury was RTA with 69.38%, followed by assault (16.76%), fall (11.04%)and sports injury was (2.87%). With respect to related injuries, a sum of 48 patients introducedhead injuries and other concomitant injuries. The most common fracture noted was mandible296 (60.53) followed by maxillary fractures 191 (39%), Zygomatic bone complex fractures 65(13.29%), Naso-orabital ethmoid fractures was 44 (8.99%), majority of patients 186 (38.0%)were arrived in morning time followed by 176 (35.9%) in evening, 88 (17.9%) in afternoon and 39(7.9%) in night, regarding the day’s most patients came on first working day that was Saturday142 (29.0%). Regarding hospital mortality, 11 (2.2%) people died within less than two days afteradmittance. Conclusion: The results of this study may support the oral surgeons to rule outother injuries at the time of primary survey and may have a key role in awareness of individualsin prevention of road traffic accidents.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 202-203
Author(s):  
Mireya Perez-Guzman ◽  
Alfredo Nava de la Vega ◽  
Arturo Pena Velarde ◽  
Tania Raisha Torres Victoria ◽  
Froylan Martinez-Sanchez ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grotenhermen

Background: To investigate the hypothesis that cases of arteritis similar to thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO) and associated with the use of cannabis were caused by cannabis or THC (dronabinol), or that cannabis use is a co-factor of TAO. Patients and methods: A systematic review on case reports and the literature on so-called cannabis arteritis, TAO, and cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids was conducted. Results: Fifteen reports with 57 cases of an arteritis associated with the use of cannabis and two additional case series of TAO, in which some patients also used cannabis, were identified. Clinical and pathological features of cannabis-associated arteritis do not differ from TAO and the major risk factor of TAO, tobacco use, was present in most, if not in all of these cases. The proposed pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of an arteritis by cannabis use are not substantiated. Conclusions: The hypothesis of cannabis being a causative factor or co-factor of TAO or an arteritis similar to TAO is not supported by the available evidence. The use of the term “cannabis arteritis” should be avoided until or unless more convincing scientific support is forthcoming.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Thomas ◽  
Joaquin Poundja ◽  
Alain Brunet ◽  
Jacques Tremblay

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Schumacher ◽  
Felix Betzler ◽  
Robert Miller ◽  
Clemens Kirschbaum ◽  
Andreas Ströhle
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document