Scaling‐Up Peacebuilding and Social Justice Work: A Conceptual Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-526
Author(s):  
Karen Ross ◽  
Charla Burnett ◽  
Yuliya Raschupkina ◽  
Darren Kew
2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Hess ◽  
Hilreth Lanig ◽  
Winston Vaughan

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 266-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariah Kornbluh ◽  
Jennifer Watling Neal ◽  
Emily J. Ozer

Nursing Forum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-729
Author(s):  
Rodnita K. Davis ◽  
Claudia Grobbel ◽  
Claire Mallette ◽  
Lynda Poly‐Droulard

Author(s):  
Marcella Milana ◽  
Massimiliano Tarozzi

This article provides a conceptual analysis of the two domains of global citizenship education and adult education and learning, along with their similarities and differences. It begins by unpacking the ambiguous and contested concept of global citizenship education and proposing a critical vision of it, within a global social justice framework. Against this backdrop, the article argues for re-conceptualizing adult education and learning as global citizenship education, instead of considering the latter to be one of the key issues of the former. Their structural link is grounded in their common epistemological nature. The domains are interlocked to the extent that both (1) promote active citizenship skills, (2) strive towards equality and social justice on a global level and (3) adopt a values-based approach and promote transformative learning. In conclusion, an original ‘Four-dimensions approach to adult education and learning as global citizenship education’ conceptual model is advanced potentially to inform policymakers, practitioners and researchers. The model is made up of four basic components of adult education and learning as global citizenship education, namely: aims and scope (what for), contents and skills (what), processes and pedagogies (how), actors and learning environments (who).


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvette Daniel

This paper analyzes the complexities of addressing the impact of globalization on educational policy. The intent is to engage in a constructive debate about education and equity in a globalized context. Although despair is sometimes inevitable, and is, oftentimes, manifested in a continuing critique of the detrimental effects of globalization on issues of equity and social justice in education, it is not the end. It could serve as the beginning of something that is not just different and redemptive but also forward thinking. There are three parts to this paper: the first offers multiple perspectives for viewing globalization followed by an analysis of the impact on issues of equity and social justice. Lastly, an abridged version of a conceptual model adapted from Ghosh (2004) aims at renegotiating cultural space in an ever-shifting milieu is discussed as a viable possibility.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Prah Ruger

Ensuring that medically necessary and appropriate health care and public health goods and services are available to all is the job of justice. The PG/SHG framework aspires to a goal of self-actualized societies imbued with a commitment to social justice, where governments and people promote the central health capabilities of all. Individual states have primary obligations to prevent and address health inequalities and externalities and to realize their populations’ health capabilities. The global community provides help and guidance when states fail to deliver, though this framework eschews coercive tactics. Rather, PG/SHG deploys public dialogue and education programs to swell support for these commitments. PG/SHG offers a conceptual model of health capability and guidance for operationalization.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith E. Edwards

Individuals who are supportive of social justice efforts are not always effective in their anti-oppression efforts. Some who genuinely aspire to act as social justice allies are harmful, ultimately, despite their best intentions, perpetuating the system of oppression they seek to change. Different underlying motivations of those who aspire to be allies can lead to differences in effectiveness, consistency, outcome, and sustainability. The conceptual model presented here, using underlying motivation to frame the different issues and challenges facing those who are aspiring allies, is offered as a tool for student affairs professionals’ self-reflection and developing students as allies for social justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document