New detections of chestnut blight in Britain during 2019‐2020 reveal high Cryphonectria parasitica diversity and limited spread of the disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Romon‐Ochoa ◽  
Jelena Kranjec Orlović ◽  
Caroline Gorton ◽  
Alex Lewis ◽  
Sietse Linde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cryphonectria Parasitica ◽  
Chestnut Blight

Crypt1, an active Ac-like transposon from the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica

2001 ◽  
Vol 265 (4) ◽  
pp. 730-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Linder-Basso ◽  
R. Foglia ◽  
P. Zhu ◽  
B.I. Hillman
Keyword(s):  
Cryphonectria Parasitica ◽  
Chestnut Blight ◽  
Chestnut Blight Fungus

scholarly journals The Morphology and the Biological Control of Cryphonectria parasitica

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Emilia PUIA ◽  
Daniela Andreea GRIGORESCU ◽  
Raluca Vasilica MICLEA
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Virulent Strain ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Castanea Sativa ◽  
Cryphonectria Parasitica ◽  
Chestnut Blight ◽  
Dual Culture ◽  
Natural Form ◽  
Hypovirulent Strain ◽  
Endothia Parasitica

Cryphonectria parasitica  (Murr.) Bar [syn. Endothia parasitica (Murr. And.] (anamorf: Endothiella sp .) is the causal agent of chestnut bark disease or chestnut blight, disease which produced great damages throughout the world, for example, in Europe, the European chestnut tree ( Castanea sativa (P.) Mill) was heavily affected. Environmental concerns have focused attention on natural forms of disease control as an effective alternative to chemical pesticides. In the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica deals with a natural form of biological control in which the virulence of a fungal pathogen is attenuated by an endogenous viral RNA genetic element- the hypovirulent strain. In our researches we picked samples of chestnut bark from different areas in Maramures county. We’ve isolated the fungus on PDA medium and we’ve studied the morphological characteristics of the usual virulent strain and we looked for a possible hypovirulent strain in order to study its capacity for biological control. The fungus develops in the bark and in cambium where forms a yellowish or brownish stroma and produces both conidia and ascospores. The pycnidia stromata break through the lenticels producing conidia and later in the same stroma develop the perithecia which produce ascospores. Both strains of the fungus were found in the research area. The hypovirulent strain had a slower development, showed no sporu lation and pigmentation “white cultural strain” and was tested in vitro for the capacity to convert the virulent isolates by dual culture tests.

scholarly journals Hard Mast Production Before and After the Chestnut Blight

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth J. Diamond ◽  
Robert H. Giles ◽  
Roy L. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Gary J. Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Cryphonectria Parasitica ◽  
Castanea Dentata ◽  
Chestnut Blight ◽  
Wildlife Species ◽  
Chestnut Blight Fungus ◽  
Southern Appalachian ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Mast Production

Abstract We estimated hard mast production of a Southern Appalachian forest for two 10 yr intervals: one before and one, 35 yr after, the chestnut blight fungus (Cryphonectria parasitica) (Murr.) Barr, had killed all mature chestnut trees. The basal area of hard mast-producing trees in the postblight forest was 28% less than in the preblight forest. The estimate of hard mast output was 34% less after the chestnut blight. Postblight production was less than preblight production for 8 of 10 yr. During 5 of these years, postblight production was only 5-27% of preblight production. Annual preblight mast production was relatively stable, whereas annual postblight production fluctuated substantially. Our findings suggest that the loss of mature chestnuts (Castanea dentata) markedly reduced the Southern Appalachian forest's carrying capacity for certain wildlife species. South. J. Appl. For 24(4):196-201.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document