Oral manifestations of congenital Zika virus infection in children with microcephaly: 18‐month follow‐up case series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Débora Teixeira Medina ◽  
Ana Paula Pires dos Santos ◽  
Fernanda Moraes Daniel Fialho Rodrigues ◽  
Branca Heloisa de Oliveira
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Mariam M. Mirambo ◽  
Lucas Matemba ◽  
Mtebe Majigo ◽  
Stephen E. Mshana

Background: Zika virus infection during pregnancy has been recently associated with congenital microcephaly and other severe neural tube defects. However, the magnitude of confirmed cases and the scope of these anomalies have not been extensively documented. This review focuses on the magnitude of laboratory-confirmed congenital Zika virus cases among probable cases and describing the patterns of congenital anomalies allegedly caused by the Zika virus, information which will inform further research in this area. Methods: We conducted a literature search for English-language articles about congenital Zika virus infection using online electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, POPLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Knowledge). The search terms used were, “zika”, “pregnancy”, [year], “microcephaly”, “infants”, “children”, “neonates”, “foetuses”, “neural tube defect”, and “CNS manifestations” in different combinations. All articles reporting cases or case series between January 2015 and December 2016 were included. Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysed to obtain proportions of the confirmed cases and patterns of anomalies. Results: A total of 24 articles (11 case series, 9 case reports, and 4 others) were found to be eligible and included in this review. These articles reported 919 cases, with or without microcephaly, presumed to have congenital Zika virus infection. Of these cases, 884 (96.2%) had microcephaly. Of the 884 cases of microcephaly, 783 (88.6%) were tested for Zika virus infection, and 216 (27.6%; 95% confidence interval, 24.5% to 30.8%) were confirmed to be Zika virus-positive. In addition to microcephaly, other common abnormalities reported – out of 442 cases investigated – were calcifications of brain tissue (n=240, 54.3%), ventriculomegaly (n=93, 20.8%), cerebellar hypoplasia (n=52, 11.7%), and ocular manifestations (n=46, 10.4%). Conclusion: Based on the available literature, Zika virus infection during pregnancy might lead to a wide array of outcomes other than microcephaly. There is a need for more epidemiological studies in Zika-endemic areas, particularly in Africa, to ascertain the role of Zika virus in causing congenital neurological defects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Mariam M. Mirambo ◽  
Lucas Matemba ◽  
Mtebe Majigo ◽  
Stephen E. Mshana

Background: Zika virus infection during pregnancy has been recently associated with congenital microcephaly and other severe neural tube defects. However, the magnitude of confirmed cases and the scope of these anomalies have not been extensively documented. This review focuses on the magnitude of laboratory-confirmed congenital Zika virus cases among probable cases and describing the patterns of congenital anomalies allegedly caused by the Zika virus, information which will inform further research in this area. Methods: We conducted a literature search for English-language articles about congenital Zika virus infection using online electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, POPLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Knowledge). The search terms used were, “zika”, “pregnancy”, [year], “microcephaly”, “infants”, “children”, “neonates”, “foetuses”, “neural tube defect”, and “CNS manifestations” in different combinations. All articles reporting cases or case series between January 2015 and December 2016 were included. Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysed to obtain proportions of the confirmed cases and patterns of anomalies. Results: A total of 24 articles (11 case series, 9 case reports, and 4 others) were found to be eligible and included in this review. These articles reported 919 cases, with or without microcephaly, presumed to have congenital Zika virus infection. Of these cases, 884 (96.2%) had microcephaly. Of the 884 cases of microcephaly, 783 (88.6%) were tested for Zika virus infection, and 216 (27.6%; 95% confidence interval, 24.5% to 30.8%) were confirmed to be Zika virus-positive. In addition to microcephaly, other common abnormalities reported – out of 442 cases investigated – were calcifications of brain tissue (n=240, 54.3%), ventriculomegaly (n=93, 20.8%), cerebellar hypoplasia (n=52, 11.7%), and ocular manifestations (n=46, 10.4%). Conclusion: Based on the available literature, Zika virus infection during pregnancy might lead to a wide array of outcomes other than microcephaly. There is a need for more epidemiological studies in Zika-endemic areas, particularly in Africa, to ascertain the role of Zika virus in causing congenital neurological defects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-474
Author(s):  
Adriana Melo ◽  
Patrícia S. Oliveira‐Szejnfeld ◽  
Gustavo Malinger ◽  
Jousilene S. Tavares ◽  
Fabiana O. Melo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S127-S127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Villa ◽  
Jose Rodriguez ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Daniela Cala ◽  
Pablo Chaparro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S598-S598
Author(s):  
Julie H Levison ◽  
Lourdes García-Fragoso ◽  
Ines E García García ◽  
Paola Del Cueto ◽  
Leticia Gely ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over three thousand children in Puerto Rico were potentially exposed to Zika virus infection during pregnancy during the 2016 Zika virus epidemic. This congenital exposure is an established risk factor for birth defects and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, which may appear after birth. Puerto Rico guidelines require consistent pediatric monitoring for early identification and intervention of children up to age five. Methods Our objective was to assess factors that influence caregiver adherence to Zika-related follow-up pediatric services in Puerto Rico. We conducted qualitative semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews with 57 individuals, including 35 caregivers (aged ≥18 years and a primary caregiver for a child with laboratory evidence of confirmed or possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy) and 22 healthcare providers or service coordinators. We explored participants’ views on barriers to Zika-related pediatric services and suggestions for improving appointment attendance. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated. We developed and applied a coding scheme based on barriers and facilitators from the Andersen Model of Health Care Utilization and Katz Model for Adolescent Vaccine Adherence (a multi-step process influenced by adolescent and caregiver factors). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes influencing adherence to Zika-related pediatric follow-up care were consistently reported throughout the interviews and focus groups discussions: (1) logistics of getting child to appointments based on clinic location, availability and costs associated with transportation, and physical requirements to transport child or multiple children; (2) complexity of requirements for follow-up appointments; and (3) caregiver burden including emotional, social, and time. Conclusion Barriers to Zika-related pediatric follow-up care in Puerto Rico are complex and multi-level. Core intervention targets should include caregiver burden, health system navigation, and coaching caregivers in communication with pediatric providers. Use of a caregiver-delivered manualized intervention led by community health workers seems appropriate to achieve these goals. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fukutani ◽  
Moreno Rodrigues ◽  
José Irahe Kasprzykowski ◽  
Cintia Figueiredo de Araujo ◽  
Alexandre Rossi Paschoal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document