Special type breast carcinoma: Sebaceous carcinoma of the breast; A case report and review of literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2034-2037
Author(s):  
Melissa Kyriakos Saad ◽  
Fatme Ghandour ◽  
George El Hachem ◽  
Fatmeh Ghandour‐Hajj ◽  
Imad El Hajj ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (19) ◽  
pp. 2960-2966
Author(s):  
Venkatalakshmi A ◽  
Vijaya Bharathi I ◽  
Satish Kumar S ◽  
Rajendra Prasad J ◽  
Bhagyalakshmi A

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravikumar Gopalakrishnan ◽  
NaveenPrasad Gopalakrishnan Ravikumar ◽  
SugapradhaGopalakrishnan Gopalakrishnan Ravikumar ◽  
Sivakami Thiagarajan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Franco-Márquez ◽  
Adrián Gerardo Torres-Gaytán ◽  
Marcela Anahí Narro-Martinez ◽  
Anahí Carrasco-Chapa ◽  
Benjamín Gómez Núñez ◽  
...  

There are few reports of breast cancer cases with uterine metastases. Here, we report a metastatic lobular carcinoma to endometrium presenting as abnormal uterine bleeding. Diagnosis was based in previous lobular breast carcinoma and immunohistochemistry.


2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. e137-e138 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Veeratterapillay ◽  
S Veeratterapillay ◽  
E Ward ◽  
H Khout ◽  
T Fasih

We report the case of a patient who presented with a painful breast lump that turned out to be an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast. The literature is reviewed, highlighting the good prognosis associated with this rare condition and the current preferred treatment modalities.


2020 ◽  
pp. 106689692093778
Author(s):  
Ludovica De Vincentiis ◽  
Maria Paola Mariani ◽  
Anna Maria Cesinaro ◽  
Anna Maria Dalena ◽  
Gerardo Ferrara

Introduction. Previously considered an exceedingly rare entity, sebaceous carcinoma of the breast is now regarded in the World Health Organization 2019 classification as a “special histopathological pattern” of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type. Case Description. In this article, we report the case of a fine needle aspiration cytology and the histopathological features of a breast carcinoma with clear-cut morphological features suggesting sebaceous differentiation, but showing no positive staining with the anti-adipophilin antibody. Conclusions. A morphologically clear-cut sebaceous differentiation is not invariably associated with adipophilin positivity; moreover, in breast carcinoma, adipophilin positivity does not automatically imply sebaceous differentiation. At present, immunomorphological evidence for the recognition of sebaceous carcinoma as a “special type” breast carcinoma subtype is too weak.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document