Neonatal and pediatric blood bank practice in the United States : Results from the AABB pediatric transfusion medicine subsection survey

Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollie M. Reeves ◽  
Erin Goodhue Meyer ◽  
Sarah K. Harm ◽  
Lani Lieberman ◽  
Ryan Pyles ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. A24-A24
Author(s):  
J. F. L.

Blood bank officials in the United States are sounding an alarm because they are facing hundreds of lawsuits from people stricken with AIDS after receiving transfusions. Issue of Screening Test The suits generally involve transfusions received before mid-1985, when blood banks started using a screening test that detects antibodies to the AIDS virus in the blood. The central legal issue involves negligence: before the screening test was entirely in place, were the blood banks negligent in their efforts to keep the virus out of the blood supply? The blood banks. . . say the AIDS threat was not fully understood immediately and it was not always clear that the tests would be reliable. Moreover, they say it was often impractical to move more rapidly. While the test has made the nation's blood supply much safer, Federal experts at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta estimate that 12,000 people now living in the United States have been infected with the AIDS virus in blood transfusions. Of these, 2,170 adults and 177 children have developed AIDS so far.


2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Novis ◽  
Richard C. Friedberg ◽  
Stephen W. Renner ◽  
Frederick A. Meier ◽  
Molly K. Walsh

Abstract Objectives.—To determine the normative distribution of time elapsed for blood bank personnel to fill nonscheduled operating room (OR) blood component orders in hospital communities throughout the United States, and to examine hospital blood bank practices associated with faster blood component delivery times. Design.—Participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement program collected data prospectively on the times elapsed for blood bank personnel to fill nonscheduled emergent orders from hospital ORs for red blood cell (RBC) products, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets (PLTs). Participants also completed questionnaires describing their hospitals' and blood banks' laboratory and transfusion practices. Setting and Participants.—Four hundred sixty-six public and private institutions located in 48 states in the United States (n = 444), Canada (n = 9), Australia (n = 8), the United Kingdom (n = 4), and Spain (n = 1). Main Outcome Measures.—The median time elapsed between requests for blood components by OR personnel and the retrieval of those components by blood component transport personnel, and the median time elapsed between requests for blood components by OR personnel and the arrival of those components in ORs. Results.—Participants submitted data on 12 647 units of RBCs, FFP, and PLTs. The median aggregate request-to-retrieval turnaround times (TATs) for RBCs, FFP, and PLTs ranged from 30 to 35 minutes, and the median aggregate request-to-arrival TATs for RBCs, FFP, and PLTs ranged from 33 to 39 minutes. Most of the TAT was consumed by events occurring prior to, rather than after release of components from blood banks. Shorter prerelease TATs were associated with having surgical schedules that listed patients' names and procedures available to blood bank personnel prior to surgeries, and having adequate clotted specimens in the blood bank and completed type-and-screen procedures performed before requests for blood components were submitted to blood banks. Among the fastest-performing 10% of participants (90th percentile and above), request-to-retrieval TATs ranged from 12 to 24 minutes for the 3 blood components, whereas among the slowest-performing 10% of participants (10th percentile and below), request-to-retrieval TATs ranged from 63 to 115 minutes for the 3 components. Median TATs ranged from 33 to 37 minutes for the 3 components. Institutions with TATs in the fastest-performing 25th percentile more frequently stored cross-matched RBCs in the OR daily, stocked PLTs for unexpected surgical use, stored PLTs in or near the OR, and had laboratory rather than nonlaboratory personnel deliver components to the OR than did those institutions with TATs in the slowest-performing 25th percentile. Conclusions.—Hospital blood bank personnel can deliver blood components to the OR in slightly longer than 30 minutes, measured from the time that those units are requested by OR personnel. Practices aimed at saving time before components are released from blood banks will be more efficient in reducing overall TAT than those practices aimed at saving time after components are released from blood banks. Specific practices associated with shorter blood delivery TATs included providing blood bank personnel with access to the names of surgical patients potentially requiring blood components, having pretransfusion testing completed on those patients prior to surgery, having ample blood products on hand, and having laboratory personnel control blood product delivery.


Transfusion ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis V. Kirchhoff ◽  
Patricia Paredes ◽  
Abel Lomelí-Guerrero ◽  
Mario Paredes-Espinoza ◽  
Carlos S. Ron-Guerrero ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-743
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Jajosky ◽  
Audrey N. Jajosky ◽  
James F. Shikle ◽  
Roni J. Bollag

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Novis ◽  
Stephen Renner ◽  
Richard C. Friedberg ◽  
Molly K. Walsh ◽  
Andrew J. Saladino

Abstract Objective.—To determine the normative rates of expiration and wastage for units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (PLTs) in hospital communities throughout the United States, and to examine hospital blood bank practices associated with more desirable (lower) rates. Design.—In 3 separate studies, participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement program collected data retrospectively on the numbers of units of FFP and PLTs that expired (outdated) prior to being used and that were wasted due to mishandling. Participants also completed questionnaires describing their hospitals' and blood banks' laboratory and transfusion practices. Setting and Participants.—One thousand six hundred thirty-nine public and private institutions, more than 80% of which were known to be located in the United States. Main Outcome Measures.—Quality indicators of FFP and PLT utilization: the rates of expiration and wastage of units of FFP and PLTs. Results.—Participants submitted data on 8 981 796 units of FFP and PLTs. In all 3 studies, aggregate combined FFP and PLT expiration rates ranged from 5.8% to 6.4% and aggregate combined FFP and PLT wastage rates ranged from 2.0% to 2.5%. Among the top-performing 10% of participants (90th percentile and above), FFP and PLT expiration rates were 0.6% or lower and FFP and PLT wastage rates were 0.5% or lower. Among the bottom-performing 10% of participants (10th percentile and below), expiration rates were 13.8% or higher and wastage rates were 6.8% or higher. We were unable to associate selected hospital characteristics or blood bank practices with lower rates of FFP and PLT utilization. Conclusions.—The rates of FFP and PLT expiration and wastage vary greatly among hospitals in the United States. Hospital blood bank personnel are capable of achieving FFP and PLT expiration and wastage rates below 1%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document