Site selection of sustainable urban drainage systems using fuzzy logic and multi‐criteria decision‐making

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 584-599
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Saadat Foomani ◽  
Bahram Malekmohammadi
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1390-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halil İbrahim Hacıoğlu ◽  
Akif Arı ◽  
Aysun Özkan ◽  
Tolga Elbir ◽  
Gürdal Tuncel ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Semadeni-Davies

This paper explores the implications of climate change and urban development on the design of sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) using the example of ponds and raingardens in Auckland, New Zealand. Many of Auckland's coastal and freshwater receiving environments have been degraded due to stormwater inflows and are potentially at further risk due to continued urbanisation and climate change. SUDS have been suggested as a possible means of adapting to those risks. However, there is little guidance available on how they should be designed for future conditions. Response-curves which relate changes in SUDS sizing to both climate change and imperviousness are presented as a means of displaying a range of possible future design needs. It is suggested that they could aid in the selection of adaptation strategies. The methodology followed is based on publicly available guidance material to provide a real world example of the design issues facing stormwater managers. An incremental adaptation strategy, whereby construction is staggered over time, is recommended for ponds which vary greatly in size depending on the projected climate and imperviousness. In contrast, adapting raingardens at the time of construction is pragmatic as the change in size, with even the maximum projected climate change, is modest.


Energy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 118222
Author(s):  
Ye Xu ◽  
Ye Li ◽  
Lijun Zheng ◽  
Liang Cui ◽  
Sha Li ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Abbi Azalia Flores-Ruvalcaba ◽  
Luis Pérez-Domínguez ◽  
Luz Angélica García-Villalba ◽  
Sara Almeraz-Durán

Multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) have accelerated in recent years. Many authors have made remarkable manipulation of the uncertainty involved in MCDM problems as a constant to make the most appropriate decision among the alternatives proposed. For this reason, fuzzy logic has been integrated into the MCDM, achieving new hybrid methodologies. These have managed to increase decision-making capacity, allowing us to manipulate nonfuzzy (quantitative) and fuzzy (qualitative) information. The main of this paper presents the comparative analysis of the Pythagorean Fuzzy CODAS method in order to examine the advantages and differences in comparison to MOORA Pythagorean Fuzzy Set method. The analysis, in this sense, aims to present a new scenario for the selection of the best decision-making problem, taking its advantages and thus achieve a greater benefit in real problems applications. An illustrative case will be presented with the MOORA-PFS methodology, to see the results obtained with Pythagorean Fuzzy CODAS. Besides, this comparative study to academics to choose more operative methods for solve MCDM problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document