On the Conditions to Prevent Plastic Shakedown of Structures: Part II—The Plastic Shakedown Limit Load

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Castrenze Polizzotto
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Material Structure ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Shakedown Limit ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Plastic Shakedown

Following the results of a companion paper, the concept of plastic shakedown limit load is introduced for an elastic-perfectly plastic material structure subjected to combined cyclic (mechanical and/or kinematical) loads and steady (mechanical) load. Static and kinematic approaches are available for the computation of this load, in perfect analogy with the classic (elastic) shakedown limit load. The plastic shakedown limit state of the structure being in an impending alternating plasticity collapse is studied and a number of interesting features of it are pointed out.

On the Conditions to Prevent Plastic Shakedown of Structures: Part I—Theory

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Castrenze Polizzotto
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Shakedown Theory ◽  
Elastic Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Plastic Shakedown ◽  
Steady Load

For a structure of elastic perfectly plastic material subjected to a given cyclic (mechanical and/or kinematical) load and to a steady (mechanical) load, the conditions are established in which plastic shakedown cannot occur whatever the steady load, and thus the structure is safe against the alternating plasticity collapse. Static and kinematic theorems, analogous to those of classical shakedown theory, are presented.

Shakedown Limit Load Determination for a Kinematically Hardening 90-Degree Pipe Bend Subjected to Constant Internal Pressure and Cyclic Bending

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany F. Abdalla ◽  
Mohammad M. Megahed ◽  
Maher Y. A. Younan
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Kinematic Hardening ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Cyclic Bending ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Shakedown Limit

A simplified technique for determining the shakedown limit load of a structure employing an elastic-perfectly-plastic material behavior was previously developed and successfully applied to a long radius 90-degree pipe bend. The pipe bend is subjected to constant internal pressure and cyclic bending. The cyclic bending includes three different loading patterns namely; in-plane closing, in-plane opening, and out-of-plane bending moment loadings. The simplified technique utilizes the finite element method and employs small displacement formulation to determine the shakedown limit load without performing lengthy time consuming full cyclic loading finite element simulations or conventional iterative elastic techniques. In the present paper, the simplified technique is further modified to handle structures employing elastic-plastic material behavior following the kinematic hardening rule. The shakedown limit load is determined through the calculation of residual stresses developed within the pipe bend structure accounting for the back stresses, determined from the kinematic hardening shift tensor, responsible for the translation of the yield surface. The outcomes of the simplified technique showed very good correlation with the results of full elastic-plastic cyclic loading finite element simulations. The shakedown limit moments output by the simplified technique are used to generate shakedown diagrams of the pipe bend for a spectrum of constant internal pressure magnitudes. The generated shakedown diagrams are compared with the ones previously generated employing an elastic-perfectly-plastic material behavior. These indicated conservative shakedown limit moments compared to the ones employing the kinematic hardening rule.

Shakedown Limits of a 90-Degree Pipe Bend Using Small and Large Displacement Formulations

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany F. Abdalla ◽  
Mohammad M. Megahed ◽  
Maher Y. A. Younan
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Material ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Material Model ◽  
Large Displacement ◽  
Small Displacement ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Loading Patterns ◽  
Elastic Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Shakedown Limit

In this paper the shakedown limit load is determined for a long radius 90-degree pipe bend using two different techniques. The first technique is a simplified technique which utilizes small displacement formulation and elastic-perfectly-plastic material model. The second technique is an iterative based technique which uses the same elastic-perfectly-plastic material model, but incorporates large displacement effects accounting for geometric non-linearity. Both techniques use the finite element method for analysis. The pipe bend is subjected to constant internal pressure magnitudes and cyclic bending moments. The cyclic bending loading includes three different loading patterns namely; in-plane closing, in-plane opening, and out-of-plane bending. The simplified technique determines the shakedown limit load (moment) without the need to perform full cyclic loading simulations or conventional iterative elastic techniques. Instead, the shakedown limit moment is determined by performing two analyses namely; an elastic analysis and an elastic-plastic analysis. By extracting the results of the two analyses, the shakedown limit moment is determined through the calculation of the residual stresses developed in the pipe bend. The iterative large displacement technique determines the shakedown limit moment in an iterative manner by performing a series of full elastic-plastic cyclic loading simulations. The shakedown limit moment output by the simplified technique (small displacement) is used by the iterative large displacement technique as an initial iterative value. The iterations proceed until an applied moment guarantees a structure developed residual stress, at load removal, equals or slightly less than the material yield strength. The shakedown limit moments output by both techniques are used to generate shakedown diagrams of the pipe bend for a spectrum of constant internal pressure magnitudes for the three loading patterns stated earlier. The maximum moment carrying capacity (limit moment) the pipe bend can withstand and the elastic limit are also determined and imposed on the shakedown diagram of the pipe bend. Comparison between the shakedown diagrams generated by the two techniques, for the three loading patterns, is presented.

Lower Bound Methods in Elastic-Plastic Shakedown Analysis

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Reinhardt ◽  
Reza Adibi-Asl
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Shakedown Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Efficient Calculation ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Plastic Shakedown

Several methods were proposed in recent years that allow the efficient calculation of elastic and elastic-plastic shakedown limits. This paper establishes a uniform framework for such methods that are based on perfectly-plastic material behavour, and demonstrates the connection to Melan’s theorem of elastic shakedown. The paper discusses implications for simplified methods of establishing shakedown, such as those used in the ASME Code. The framework allows a clearer assessment of the limitations of such simplified approaches. Application examples are given.

Shakedown Limits of a 90-Degree Pipe Bend Using Small and Large Displacement Formulations

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany F. Abdalla ◽  
Mohammad M. Megahed ◽  
Maher Y. A. Younan
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Material ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Material Model ◽  
Large Displacement ◽  
Small Displacement ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Loading Patterns ◽  
Elastic Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Shakedown Limit

In this paper the shakedown limit load is determined for a long radius 90-deg pipe bend using two different techniques. The first technique is a simplified technique which utilizes small displacement formulation and elastic–perfectly plastic material model. The second technique is an iterative based technique which uses the same elastic–perfectly plastic material model, but incorporates large displacement effects accounting for geometric nonlinearity. Both techniques use the finite element method for analysis. The pipe bend is subjected to constant internal pressure magnitudes and cyclic bending moments. The cyclic bending loading includes three different loading patterns, namely, in-plane closing, in-plane opening, and out-of-plane bending. The simplified technique determines the shakedown limit load (moment) without the need to perform full cyclic loading simulations or conventional iterative elastic techniques. Instead, the shakedown limit moment is determined by performing two analyses, namely, an elastic analysis and an elastic–plastic analysis. By extracting the results of the two analyses, the shakedown limit moment is determined through the calculation of the residual stresses developed in the pipe bend. The iterative large displacement technique determines the shakedown limit moment in an iterative manner by performing a series of full elastic–plastic cyclic loading simulations. The shakedown limit moment output by the simplified technique (small displacement) is used by the iterative large displacement technique as an initial iterative value. The iterations proceed until an applied moment guarantees a structure developed residual stress, at load removal, equal to or slightly less than the material yield strength. The shakedown limit moments output by both techniques are used to generate shakedown diagrams of the pipe bend for a spectrum of constant internal pressure magnitudes for the three loading patterns stated earlier. The maximum moment carrying capacity (limit moment) the pipe bend can withstand and the elastic limit are also determined and imposed on the shakedown diagram of the pipe bend. Comparison between the shakedown diagrams generated by the two techniques, for the three loading patterns, is presented.

Lower Bound Methods in Elastic-Plastic Shakedown Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Reinhardt ◽  
Reza Adibi-Asl
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Shakedown Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Efficient Calculation ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Plastic Shakedown

Several methods were proposed in recent years that allow the efficient calculation of elastic and elastic-plastic shakedown limits. This paper establishes a uniform framework for such methods that are based on perfectly-plastic material behavior, and demonstrates the connection to Melan's theorem of elastic shakedown. The paper discusses implications for simplified methods of establishing shakedown, such as those used in the ASME Code. The framework allows a clearer assessment of the limitations of such simplified approaches. Application examples are given.

A limit load solution for a thick-walled cylinder with a fully circumferential crack under axial tension

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Budden ◽  
Y Lei
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Yield Criterion ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Cylinder Wall ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Elastic Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Inside Radius ◽  
Walled Cylinder

Limit loads for a thick-walled cylinder with an internal or external fully circumferential surface crack under pure axial load are derived on the basis of the von Mises yield criterion. The solutions reproduce the existing thin-walled solution when the ratio between the cylinder wall thickness and the inside radius tends to zero. The solutions are compared with published finite element limit load results for an elastic–perfectly plastic material. The comparison shows that the theoretical solutions are conservative and very close to the finite element data.

Shakedown Boundary and Limit Load Determination of a 90-Degree Back to Back Pipe Bend Subjected to Steady Internal Perssures and Cyclic In-Plane Bending Moments

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany F. Abdalla
Keyword(s):  
Limit Load ◽  
Bending Moments ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Shakedown Analysis ◽  
Plane Bending ◽  
Piping Networks ◽  
Aero Engines ◽  
Shakedown Limit ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Internal Pressures

Shakedown analysis of 90–degree back–to–back pipe bends is scarce within open literature. According the author’s knowledge, no shakedown analysis exists for such structure based on experimental data. Ninety degree back–to–back pipe bends are extensively utilized within piping networks of nuclear submarines and modern turbofan aero–engines where space limitation is considered a paramount concern. Additionally, on larger scales, 90–degree back–to–back pipe bend configurations are also found within piping networks of huge liquefied natural gas tankers. The structure analyzed is formed by bending a straight pipe to acquire the geometry of two 90–degree pipe bends set back–to–back each having a nominal pipe size (NPS) of 10 in. Schedule 40 Standard (STD). In the current research, the 90–degree back–to–back pipe bend setup analyzed is subjected to a spectrum of steady internal pressures and cyclic in–plane bending moments. A previously developed simplified technique for determining elastic shakedown limit loads is utilized to generate the elastic shakedown boundary of the 90–degree back–to–back pipe bend analyzed. In addition to determining the elastic shakedown boundary, elastic and post shakedown domains (Bree diagram), the maximum moment carrying capacities (limit moments) are also determined and imposed on the generated Bree diagram of the analyzed structure. The simplified technique outcomes showed excellent correlation with the results of full elastic–plastic cyclic loading finite element simulations.

scholarly journals Ratcheting Assessment of a Fixed Tube Sheet Heat Exchanger Subject to In Phase Pressure and Temperature Cycles

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khosrow Behseta ◽  
Donald Mackenzie ◽  
Robert Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Plastic Material ◽  
Sheet Thickness ◽  
Peak Stress ◽  
Material Model ◽  
Tube Sheet ◽  
Hardening Material ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Inelastic Analysis ◽  
Plastic Shakedown

An investigation of the cyclic elastic-plastic response of an Olefin plant heat exchanger subject to cyclic thermal and pressure loading is presented. Design by analysis procedures for assessment of shakedown and ratcheting are considered, based on elastic and inelastic analysis methods. The heat exchanger tube sheet thickness is nonstandard as it is considerably less than that required by conventional design by formula rules. Ratcheting assessment performed using elastic stress analysis and stress linearization indicates that shakedown occurs under the specified loading when the nonlinear component of the through thickness stress is categorized as peak stress. In practice, the presence of the peak stress will cause local reverse plasticity or plastic shakedown in the component. In nonlinear analysis with an elastic–perfectly plastic material model the vessel exhibits incremental plastic strain accumulation for 10 full load cycles, with no indication that the configuration will adapt to steady state elastic or plastic action, i.e., elastic shakedown or plastic shakedown. However, the strain increments are small and would not lead to the development of a global plastic collapse or gross plastic deformation during the specified life of the vessel. Cyclic analysis based on a strain hardening material model indicates that the vessel will adapt to plastic shakedown after 6 load cycles. This indicates that the stress categorization and linearization assumptions made in the elastic analysis are valid for this configuration.

A Study on Plastic Shakedown of Structures: Part I—Basic Properties

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Polizzotto
Keyword(s):  
Solid Body ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Basic Properties ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Elastic Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Plastic Shakedown

For a continuous elastic-perfectly plastic solid body subjected to a combination of cyclic (mechanical and/or kinematical) load and of a steady (mechanical) load such as to produce plastic shakedown (i.e., alternating plasticity), a number of characterizing properties are established and discussed. The conditions for the body’s transition from plastic shakedown to ratchetting are also addressed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document