scholarly journals Turbomachinery Engineering and Optimization for 25 MW and 50 MW Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems

Author(s):  
Robert Schainker ◽  
Michael Nakhamkin ◽  
John R. Stange ◽  
Louis F. Giannuzzi

Results of engineering and optimization of 25 MW and 50 MW turbomachinery trains for compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant application are presented. Submitted by equipment suppliers, proposals are based on the commercially available equipment. Performance data and budget prices indicate that the CAES power plant is one of the most cost effective sources of providing peaking power and load management.

Author(s):  
M. Nakhamkin ◽  
F. D. Hutchinson ◽  
J. R. Stange ◽  
R. B. Schainker ◽  
F. Canova

Results of engineering and optimization of 25 MW and 50 MW turbomachinery trains for compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant application are presented. Proposals submitted by equipment suppliers are based on commercially available equipment. Performance data and budget prices indicate that the CAES power plant is one of the most cost effective sources of providing peaking/intermediate power and load management. The paper addresses CAES power plant integration procedure and the specifics of turbomachinery design.


Author(s):  
Sammy Houssainy ◽  
Reza Baghaei Lakeh ◽  
H. Pirouz Kavehpour

Human activity is overloading our atmosphere with carbon dioxide and other global warming emissions. These emissions trap heat, increase the planet’s temperature, and create significant health, environmental, and climate issues. Electricity production accounts for more than one-third of U.S. global warming emissions, with the majority generated by coal-fired power plants. These plants produce approximately 25 percent of total U.S. global warming emissions. In contrast, most renewable energy sources produce little to no global warming emissions. Unfortunately, generated electricity from renewable sources rarely provides immediate response to electrical demands, as the sources of generation do not deliver a regular supply easily adjustable to consumption needs. This has led to the emergence of storage as a crucial element in the management of energy, allowing energy to be released into the grid during peak hours and meet electrical demands. Compressed air energy storage can potentially allow renewable energy sources to meet electricity demands as reliably as coal-fired power plants. Most compressed air energy storage systems run at very high pressures, which possess inherent problems such as equipment failure, high cost, and inefficiency. This research aims to illustrate the potential of compressed air energy storage systems by illustrating two different discharge configurations and outlining key variables, which have a major impact on the performance of the storage system. Storage efficiency is a key factor to making renewable sources an independent form of sustainable energy. In this paper, a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a compressed air energy storage system is presented. Specifically, a detailed study of the first law of thermodynamics of the entire system is presented followed by a thorough analysis of the second law of thermodynamics of the complete system. Details of both discharge and charge cycles of the storage system are presented. The first and second law based efficiencies of the system are also presented along with parametric studies, which demonstrates the effects of various thermodynamic cycle variables on the total round-trip efficiency of compressed air energy storage systems.


Author(s):  
M. Nakhamkin ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
L. Andersson ◽  
P. Abitante ◽  
A. Cohn

This paper presents the results of a project targeted at developing cost effective power plant concept with integrated Coal Gasification System (CGS) and with Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) plant. The developed concepts, denoted as CGS/CAES, provide for continuous operation of CGS and the reheat turboexpander train which are high temperature components, thus improving their operation and extending life resource. A parametric thermodynamic analysis is performed for several CGS/CAES concepts differentiated by their turbomachinery parameters, CGS arrangements, operating cycles, and hours of daily generation. A qualitative cost estimate is made using a variety of sources including published EPRI reports and extensive in-house cost data. A technical and cost comparison is made to the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant.


2018 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengni Zhou ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
Wenji Song ◽  
Ziping Feng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document