Model Uncertainty Approximation Using a Copula-Based Approach for Reliability Based Design Optimization

Author(s):  
Hao Pan ◽  
Zhimin Xi ◽  
Ren-Jye Yang

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) has been widely used to design engineering products with minimum cost function while meeting defined reliability constraints. Although uncertainties, such as aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty, have been well considered in RBDO, they are mainly considered for model input parameters. Model uncertainty, i.e., the uncertainty of model bias which indicates the inherent model inadequacy for representing the real physical system, is typically overlooked in RBDO. This paper addresses model uncertainty characterization in a defined product design space and further integrates the model uncertainty into RBDO. In particular, a copula-based bias correction approach is proposed and results are demonstrated by two vehicle design case studies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Jiang ◽  
Haobo Qiu ◽  
Xiaoke Li ◽  
Zhenzhong Chen ◽  
Liang Gao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiki Matsumura ◽  
Raphael T. Haftka

Design under uncertainty needs to account for aleatory uncertainty, such as variability in material properties, and epistemic uncertainty including errors due to imperfect analysis tools. While there is a consensus that aleatory uncertainty be described by probability distributions, for epistemic uncertainty there is a tendency to be more conservative by taking worst case scenarios or 95th percentiles. This conservativeness may result in substantial performance penalties. Epistemic uncertainty, however, is usually reduced by additional knowledge typically provided by tests. Then, redesign may take place if tests show that the design is not acceptable. This paper proposes a reliability based design optimization (RBDO) method that takes into account the effects of future tests possibly followed by redesign. We consider each realization of epistemic uncertainty to correspond to a different design outcome. Then, the future scenario, i.e., test and redesign, of each possible design outcome is simulated. For an integrated thermal protection system (ITPS) design, we show that the proposed method reduces the mass penalty associated with a 95th percentile of the epistemic uncertainty from 2.7% to 1.2% compared to standard RBDO, which does not account for the future. We also show that the proposed approach allows trading off mass against development costs as measured by probability of needing redesign. Finally, we demonstrate that the tradeoff can be achieved even with the traditional safety factor based design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document