IceCube CFD Drilling Model

Author(s):  
Richard A. Martin ◽  
Tim Thompson ◽  
Naseem Ansari ◽  
Chokri Guetari

A numerical model of a hot water drill used to produce deep holes in clear ice at the South Pole for the IceCube neutrino observatory program scheduled for completion in 2010 has been developed. The model was built using the ANSYS commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, ANSYS CFX. This drill model is helping us to understand the water/ice melting process near the bottom of the drill hole, and to evaluate the influence of nozzle size, spray angle, water flow rate, and water temperature on the drill hole shape, and on drilling speed. The basis for the model is ANSYS CFX, which has multi-phase, conjugate heat transfer capabilities. The model utilizes a multi-phase approach, and simulates motion of the drill with respect to the ice. The sensitivity of model predictions to mesh resolution, turbulence model, and interfacial heat transfer coefficients, area, and drag coefficient was studied, and the results were used to determine preferred values in each case. This multi-phase model was selected after evaluating an equilibrium model and obtaining results showing not completely satisfactory comparisons to experimental data from the South Pole. Computations at a drill depth of 1292 m allowed validation of code results using actual field data obtained during the 2004–2005 IceCube drilling season at Antarctica. A series of steady-state runs using two drill sizes, two drill speeds, and one spray angle were performed for conditions at 1292 m to determine if a smaller nozzle orifice would enable faster drilling, preferably by a factor of two. The model predicted a drill hole diameter of from 18 in to 25 in and an up-flow water temperature of from 20°C to 28°C. The drill hole diameter is consistent with values measured at the IceCube site, but the water temperature is about 10°C low. No evidence of the nozzle tip impacting the bottom of the hole was found in the drill speed range 3.5 ft/min to 7 ft/min. A nozzle spray angle of 25 degrees was found to make little difference in hole depth or diameter. Reducing the nozzle diameter from 1 in to 0.75 in at the same water volumetric flow rate resulted in an increase in the drill hole depth by from 16% to 20%. The latter result implies that faster drilling is expected when using a smaller size orifice with zero degree spray angle. The IceCube drill model is now available to determine the effects of key variables, to evaluate the performance of new nozzle designs, and to specify drill speed versus depth. Recommendations specific to faster drilling speeds resulted in a near doubling of actual speed during the 2005–2006 season at the South Pole.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Abiodun Ismail LAWAL ◽  
Akande Jide Muili

The research work examines the effects of controllable blasting variables on number of boulders generated after blasting. The objective of the research was achieved through collection of data related to blasting which are drill hole depth, drill hole diameter, burden, spacing, average charge per hole, and specific charge. The collected data were analysed statistically using both Microsoft Excel Software and SPSS Software. The result of the analysis reveals that all the input controllable blasting variables which are drill hole diameter (X1), drill hole depth (X2), hole spacing (X3), burden (X4), average charge per hole (X5), specific charge(X6) that participated as independent variables in the models are found to be significant and the R2 values obtained from the graph show a very strong correlation between the number of boulders generated after blasting and the input variables except that of drill hole diameter which shows a very weak correlation. The equation generated using the SPSS could be used to determine number of boulders generated after blasting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Federica La Longa ◽  
Massimo Crescimbene ◽  
Lucilla Alfonsi ◽  
Claudio Cesaroni ◽  
Vincenzo Romano
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena J. Randolph ◽  
Alan D. Maccarone

Abstract Predation on bivalve mollusks by gastropod mollusks is common in coastal regions of the United States; however, few previous studies have examined whether drilling gastropods exhibit prey selection. In 2016, shells with small holes drilled by as many as two gastropod predators were collected at three sites separated by 30 km along the Texas Upper Gulf Coast on the Bolivar Peninsula (29° 40′N, 94° 90′W). The likeliest predators in these waters are the southern oyster drill (Stramonita haemastoma Linnaeus 1767) and the moon snail (Neverita duplicate Say 1822). Collected shells were identified to species and measurements were taken to examine statistical relationships between predators and prey species. These measurements included drill-hole diameter, shell thickness, drill-hole completeness, number of drill attempts, and collection site. Across the three locations, 17 different species of shells with drill holes were collected; of these, we focused on the ten most abundant species (n = 277 shells). The sample showed high variation in drill-hole diameter, shell thickness, and drill-hole completeness. Both the total number of holes and mean drill-hole diameter differed significantly among prey species (ANOVA, both P < 0.0001). In addition, drill-hole diameter correlated directly with prey shell thickness (P < 0.0001). Shells whose drill holes were complete were significantly thinner than shells with incomplete holes (P < 0.0001). Mean prey shell thickness, mean drill-hole diameter, and mean number of drill holes all differed significantly by collection site (all P < 0.0001). Ecological and morphological implications related to gastropod predation on mollusks are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (02) ◽  
pp. T02002-T02002
Author(s):  
M.G. Aartsen ◽  
M. Ackermann ◽  
J. Adams ◽  
J.A. Aguilar ◽  
M. Ahlers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Kyle R. Clem ◽  
Ryan L. Fogt ◽  
John Turner ◽  
Benjamin R. Lintner ◽  
Gareth J. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 1381-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L. Chang ◽  
P. Ade ◽  
K. Aird ◽  
J. Austermann ◽  
J. Beall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document